In the December 15, 2000 Issue:
- New Jersey Launches $40 Million VC Partnership
- Technology, Economic Summits Yielding Results: A look at MN, MS, and WI
- Group Recommends Measure to Improve Minnesota Economy
- Western Virginia Explores Its Future
- Northeast-Midwest Institute Reports on Federal Spending by State
- Funding Opportunities
- USDA, NIH Inventions Offered
Copyright State Science & Technology Institute 2002. Information in this issue of the SSTI Weekly Digest was prepared under a cooperative agreement with the U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration. Redistribution to all others interested in tech-based economic development is strongly encouraged please cite the State Science & Technology Institute whenever portions are reproduced or redirected. Any opinions expressed in the Digest do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Commerce.
Subscription to the SSTI Weekly Digest is free. If you are reading a forwarded copy of this issue and would like to receive your own copy each week directly, please subscribe at: http://www.ssti.org/Digest/digform.htm Requests to unsubscribe should be sent to sstiwd@ssti.org
New Jersey Launches $40 Million VC Partnership
After discovering that only 10 percent of the venture capital raised in New Jersey is invested in New Jersey companies, a new venture fund has been established combining private, state, and federal resources. The seed investment fund will be used to assist New Jersey start-up technology businesses get off the ground.
Led by the nonprofit New Jersey Technology Council, NJTC Venture Fund partners include private investors and the New Jersey Economic Development Authority. The Authority is providing a 1:3 match for each private dollar raised, up to $10 million. Local newspapers report $22 million in private investment has been raised to date toward the goal of $30 million. The Small Business Investment Corporation (SBIC) program of the Small Business Administration may be used to further leverage the fund.
NJTC Venture Fund will provide between $300,000 to $3 million in seed money to start-ups in a variety of industries, including software, communications, biotech, photonics, healthcare, and electronics companies.
The NJTC was formed in 1996 as a private, non-profit organization dedicated to providing networking opportunities, information and other services to New Jersey technology businesses and now boasts a membership of about 1,000 high tech companies. The state development office estimates that there are some 3,000 more technology companies in Northern New Jersey than in Silicon Valley, but that initial investment is significantly lower in the Garden States new tech businesses.
More information is available at: http://www.njtc.orgReturn to the top of this page
Technology/Economic Summits Yielding Results
What can policymakers and practitioners do if the statistics and other metrics indicate a state, region or locality is not well positioned for the technology-based economy, but the elected leaders and economic development professionals are plodding along with traditional approaches to job creation and development? Or, on the other hand, what if there are several fragmented or isolated technology-related activities and success stories occuring that could benefit from a little political exposure and synergy?
Jump-starting tech-based economic development often requires a shift in the mindset or thinking of the economic and political stakeholders for a state or community. Tools often used to encourage this change in outlook include innovation indices or S&T report cards that present the state or region's relative performance along several metrics. Creating state science and technology councils or drafting strategic plans for tech-based economic development are other often used approaches for trying to keep public investment in science and technology on the public agenda.
A third approach is the use of large public conferences or summits to convey the importance of changing paths in economic development policy or to recognize and reward the technology-based activities already underway. Maryland, for example, has held an annual technology summit since 1998. The approach has been particularly popular in the last three months. Minnesota, Mississippi and Wisconsin present three examples:
Minnesota
Twelve hundred people attended a Summit on Minnesotas Economy, convened by the University of Minnesota on September 20, 2000. Held in response to growing concern over the position of the state to compete in the New Economy, the summit included briefings by experts in a number of areas. The summit examined:
- How Minnesotas economy is doing
- The key technology components that drive successful new economies
- How Minnesota can enhance its competitiveness
At the end of the summit, a 22-member Working Group on Minnesotas Economy was appointed by University of Minnesota President Mark Yudof. The Working Group has subsequently released a comprehensive listing of recommendations for improving the states economic development (see story following this article). More information on the summit is available at: http://www1.umn.edu/summit/
Mississippi
The Governor's Conference on High Technology, sponsored in part by the Mississippi Economic Council attracted more than 750 people -- nearly twice the expected turnout. Conference topics included:
- addressing the digital divide,
- investing in university research,
- encouraging venture capital, and
- defining cluster-based economic development.
One goal of the early-November event was to increase communication among Mississippi's technology businesses. More specific information on the agenda is available at: http://www.msmec.com/
Wisconsin
Hosted by the University of Wisconsin, the Wisconsin Economic Summit brought together more than 850 people representing labor, business, public education, technical and post-secondary education, state agencies and existing economic development groups. The event was actually the capstone of a several-month effort of planning and 15 regional "listening sessions" held throughout the state in the weeks leading upto the summit. Several academic white papers were developed in preparation for the summit.
Governor Tommy Thompson told the audience in his keynote address that his goal is to make Wisconsin the national leader in biotechnology. His initiatives include guaranteeing access to the University of Wisconsin system for every technical college graduate with a B average and expanding a youth options program that allows high school juniors and seniors to take college courses.
Thompson said he also favors a tax incentives package that includes an airport hub exemption and development zones to make the state more attractive to businesses. He said he will ask the State Investment Board to invest another $50 million in venture capital and announced he will hold a venture capital summit in early 2001.
The University of Wisconsin System announced it will bolster technology transfer by expanding its Small Business Development Centers and form a joint UW-Madison/UW-Milwaukee business incubator.A formal report of the summit will be presented to Governor Thompson in December. A website, http://www.wisconsin.edu/summit which includes links to the white papers will remain online for several months, a CD-ROM version of the 42 white papers will be made available, a final report distributed by Feb. 1 to participants and the public. A follow-up session will be scheduled next November.
Return to the top of this page
Group Recommends Measure to Improve Minnesota Economy
Following on the Summit on Minnesotas Economy, a 21-member group appointed by the president of the University of Minnesota has unveiled its recommendations to strengthen the states economy. The recommendations in Report to the People of Minnesota: Building a Knowledge Economy for Minnesotas 21st Century are divided among five strategies:
Recommendations in the new report are divided among five strategies:
- Developing a knowledge-driven industry cluster strategy to cultivate Minnesota's strengths within existing industries, and to develop emerging Minnesota industry clusters, starting with: health care -- particularly medical technology; biosciences -- especially applications in agriculture; and communications and information technology - particularly in storage technology and data communications. The Working Group recommends building workforce skills, research and innovation and fostering entrepreneurship in these significant industry clusters.
- Cultivating a competitive workforce for the 21st century through initiatives such as merit-based scholarships for Minnesota top ranked high school graduates to attend Minnesota post-secondary public and private institutions; in-state tuition for high-achieving non-resident students majoring in science and technology fields; identifying critical 21st Century skill sets; aligning training for new and existing workers with the needs of current and growing industries; and raising awareness of students and existing workers regarding promising Minnesota industries and occupations.
- Creating top-ranked research and innovation capacity aimed at building critical mass in research and development areas important to the state's future. Recommendations include strengthening the University of Minnesota as the state's flagship research institution, especially in critical science and technology fields directly related to emerging industry clusters; supporting industry-led research and development and commercialization of technologies, such as creating the Northstar Research Coalition to foster joint research and innovation.
- Fostering a positive business climate to support entrepreneurship and business growth through a more favorable tax environment, coordinated strategies to encourage businesses to expand and locate in Minnesota, and promoting Minnesota as a desirable place to live, work, learn and do business.
- Building an enduring leadership coalition to guide the strategy's implementation and future economic development. In the interim, the Working Group has agreed to help identify and advocate for the recommendations set forth.
In addition to calling for innovative private-public sector partnerships, the Working Group's plan provides broad support for legislative initiatives such as funding support for rural telecommunications and technology commercialization.
More information on the proposals is available at: http://www1.umn.edu/summit/Return to the top of this page
Western Virginia Explores Its Future
Western Virginias economy is stagnant due to a variety of factors and must get in line with the New Economy according to a report commissioned by the Center for Innovative Leadership in Roanoke. A second study by the Center revealed the area's residents appear willing to support activities designed to bring new business and employment to the region.
The report concluded that despite a favorable quality of life in the New Century Region," as Western Virginia calls itself, the area's economy has been concentrated heavily on declining manufacturing industries and must find ways to attract high technology business.
The region is home to the fourth largest concentration of population in Virginia, but has suffered from cutbacks in defense spending, increases in global competition and corporate mergers. Employment in the region increased by only 0.2 percent in 1999 compared to 2.7 percent for the entire state. The lack of new businesses contributed to stagnant population growth of 0.3 percent in the 1990s versus 1.5 percent for all of Virginia.
The industry mix in the [New Century Region] has not kept up with the changes in national and local demand and the industry mix is concentrated in forms that have grown at a sluggish rate or have declined over the last few years, the report said.
The report recommends the region target economic development policies toward fast-growing high tech industries to compensate for an expected decline in labor-intensive industries that currently exist there.
On the positive side, the report found that the area has an excellent higher education base, led by Virginia Polytechnic Institute and the Carillon Biomedical Institute, that could be a catalyst to transform the region into the biomedical capital of Virginia.The public opinion survey, taken by 570 respondents and 130 governmental leaders, revealed that most residents recognize there are economic problems in the region. However, there is a willingness to seek cooperation among the 17 entities in the New Century Region to improve the economy.
Three-quarters of the respondents said they favor a course of action that will result in economic growth and agree that high tech jobs are needed.
While the general population in the the region remains cautious about growth, 88 percent of government leaders are strongly in favor of economic development, even if it means the region might become more congested and might lose some natural areas. Most citizens favor government incentives for business recruitment and for growth and regulations.
The 106-page combined report is available for download at www.innovativeleadership.org
Return to the top of this page
Northeast-Midwest Institute Reports on Federal Spending by State
Despite small improvements, Northeast and Midwest regions lag behind the South and West in terms of dollars returned to states from taxes sent to Washington, according to a report issued by the Northeast-Midwest Institute.The Northeast-Midwest regions return on every tax dollar was $0.88, while the South received an estimated $1.18 in federal spending for every dollar sent to Washington and the West had a return of $1.01, according to Flow of Federal Funds to the States: Fiscal 1999.
Other highlights include:
- The Northeast-Midwest region made up 40.36 percent of the nations population but had 44.61 percent of the nations total tax burden, and received 39.20 percent of the 50-state federal spending total in fiscal 1999. In 1999, the South and West, with 59.64 percent of the population, paid 55.39 percent of federal taxes, and received back 60.80 percent of federal spending.
- The Northeast-Midwest region received $575.9 billion in federal funding, or $5,243 per capita, in fiscal 1999. This per-capita amount equals 97 percent of the 50-state per-capita level of $5,397, one percentage point lower than in fiscal 1998. By comparison, the South and West received $893.1 billion, or $5,502 per capita, in fiscal 1999 equal to 102 percent of the national level.
- Of the $1.788 trillion the federal government collected in taxes in fiscal 1999, $797.5 billion came from the Northeast-Midwest, and $990.3 billion from the South and West. But on a per-person basis, the Northeast-Midwest regions share of $7,261 represented 111 percent of the 50-state per-capita figure of $6,569 and the Northeasts fiscal 1999 share stood at $7,914 on a per-capita basis, which amounts to 120 percent of the national figure. Both the South and West had lower-than-average per capita amounts of $5,800 and $6,474, respectively.
- The 10 states with the highest return in fiscal 1999 were New Mexico, Montana, West Virginia, Mississippi, North Dakota, Alaska, Virginia, Hawaii, South Dakota, and Alabama.
- The top 10 states with the lowest return on their federal tax dollar in fiscal 1999 included: Connecticut, New Jersey, New Hampshire, Nevada, Illinois, Minnesota, Michigan, Delaware, Wisconsin, and New York.
The data used in the Northeast-Midwest Institutes analysis were drawn primarily from Federal Expenditures by State for Fiscal Year 1999, published by the U.S. Bureau of the Census, and Special Report: 1999 Federal Tax Burdens and Expenditures by State, published by the Tax Foundation.
The Institutes report analyzes federal spending patterns in the Northeast-Midwest and other regions of the country, and includes data tables for all 50 states. The report is available electronically on the Internet at http://www.nemw.org/fedspending.htm.
Return to the top of this page
Funding Opportunities
The Department of Energy through its National Energy Technology Laboratory will conduct a program solicitation and award cooperative agreements for a program entitled Energy Efficient Building Equipment and Envelop Technologies, Round III. The DOE/NETL seeks applications for innovative technologies that have the potential for significant energy savings in residential and commercial buildings. The objective is to accelerate high-payoff technologies that are unlikely to be developed in a timely manner without a partnership between industry and the federal government. The program solicitation will be available on the NETL website http://www.netl.doe.gov/business/index.html on or about Dec. 15, 2000. The solicitation number is DE-PS26-01NT41092.The Department of Energys Office of Biological and Environmental Research has announced its interest in receiving applications for research grants in the Natural and Accelerated Biomedical Research Program in the areas of biogeochemistry, biotransformation, community dynamics, and assessment projects which relate to those elements. Although not required, researchers are strongly encouraged to submit brief one-to-two page pre-applications which are due Jan. 8, 2001; the deadline for formal applications is Feb. 28, 2001. The awards will be made in late FY 2001 or early FY 2002. Approximately $2 million will be available for multiple awards and applicants may request project support for up to three years. Annual budgets for projects in the four scientific research elements are expected to range from $100,000 to $400,000 in total costs. Additional information may be obtained at http://lbl.gov/NABIR
The Department of Energy Office of Basic Energy Sciences intends to receive grant applications for support under its Robotics and Intelligent Machines (RIM) Program. The purpose of RIM is to develop cost-effective solutions to tasks relating to energy efficiency, safety, and security. Applications should be from investigators currently involved in basic research in this area and should be submitted through a U.S. academic institution. Pre-application deadline is Jan. 2, 2001; deadline for receipt of formal applications is March 20, 2001. This is a new program and it is anticipated that approximately $2 million will be available in FY 2001 for research. Awards are expected to range up to $500,000 annually with terms of one to three years. Further information may be obtained at the following website:
http://www.sc.doe.gov/production/grants/grants.htmlThe Department of Commerce, through its National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, is soliciting one- and two-year proposals for career development programs commencing in late FY 2001 with an anticipated start date of July 1, 2001. The purpose of these awards is to support activities designed to facilitate and/or enhance the development of qualified professionals in the fields of coastal ocean science, management, and policy. The deadline for receipt of proposals is Jan. 23, 2001, and it is anticipated that final decisions on awards will be made in early March, 2001. Detailed information on the grant availability is on the website: http://www.cop.noaa.gov
Return to the top of this page
USDA, NIH Inventions Offered for License
The U.S. Department of Agrciulture and the National Institutes of Health released information on 24 inventions that are available for license. Descriptions and contact information for each invention/patent are presented on the accompanying SSTI webpageReturn to the top of this page
State Science & Technology Institute
5015 Pine Creek Drive
Westerville, OH 43081
Phone: (614) 901-1690
Fax: (614) 901-1696
Email: ssti@ssti.org© 2002 State Science and Technology Institute. All rights reserved.