- Indiana Governor Signs Budget Bill to Energize State's Economy
- Maine Voters to Consider $60M Bond, Most Targeting TBED
- HUD 'SuperNOFA' Offers More Than $2.3B in Grants
- Venture-backed Women-led Enterprises Perform Well, Springboard Survey Shows
- Virginia Alliance Sees First Fruits of 2002 Strategic Plan
- Recommended Reading: Understanding and Building Bioregions
- People
- Do It For Mom
Copyright State Science & Technology Institute 2003. Information in this issue of the SSTI Weekly Digest was prepared under a cooperative agreement with the U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration. Redistribution to all others interested in tech-based economic development is strongly encouraged please cite the State Science & Technology Institute whenever portions are reproduced or redirected. Any opinions expressed in the Digest do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Commerce.
Subscription to the SSTI Weekly Digest is free. If you are reading a forwarded copy of this issue and would like to receive your own copy each week directly, please subscribe at http://www.ssti.org/Digest/digform.htm. Requests to unsubscribe also may be completed at http://www.ssti.org/Digest/digform.htm.
Indiana Governor Signs Budget Bill to Energize State's Economy
During a legislative season that was marked by heated discussions in most statehouses on what to cut or save, Indiana is one of a handful of states so far that focused considerable debate on planting the seeds for a stronger future through technology-based economic development. The compromise crafted between Democratic Governor Frank O'Bannon – who started the discussion when he outlined his Energize Indiana initiative in his State of the State Address – a Republican controlled Senate with a countering JOBZ proposal, and an independent minded House (controlled by the Democrats) positions the Hoosier State among the leaders for promoting a technology-based economy.The state's research and technology community, catalyzed by recissions and cuts in the FY 2003 budget, played a significant and vocal role in pushing for a more comprehensive portfolio of programs and credits for the next biennium.
The two-year budget bill recently signed by Gov. O'Bannon includes $75 million for research and development (R&D), $9 million for technology parks and $50 million for venture capital tax credits, among other initiatives. HB 1001 passed with bipartisan support among the state's General Assembly, being approved by the State House, 61-37, and the State Senate, 34-16. Highlights of the bill are:
- $75 million for the 21st Century Research and Technology Fund, which serves to stimulate the development and commercialization of advanced technologies in Indiana. The fund's activities had been put on hold in FY03 as the state worked to resolve its budget shortfall.
- $50 million over five years for tax credits to promote Indiana venture capital initiatives. In addition, the budget extends the state's R&D tax credit of 10 percent until 2013.
- $10 million to expand the I-Light fiber optic network that presently includes Indiana University at Bloomington, IUPUI and Purdue University at West Lafayette.
- $9 million for certified technology parks.
- $4.2 million for rural development, including telecommunications and workforce development needs. The bill provides that the Indiana Rural Development Council will administer a Rural Development Administration Fund meant "to create, assess and assist a pilot project to enhance the economic and community development in a rural area." A 16-member advisory board will oversee all expenditures.
- Funding for $344 million in university construction projects, including several research facilities.
Governor O'Bannon's plan is intended to create high-wage, high-skill jobs in the advanced manufacturing, information technology, high-tech distribution and life sciences industries. While the governor's original 10-year job creation plan would not have used state tax money, Energize Indiana, as passed by the General Assembly, will be paid for through a combination of General Fund, tobacco settlement fund and federal economic stimulus dollars.
HB 1001 is available at http://www.IN.gov/legislative/bills/2003/EH/EH1001.3.html. More information on Energize Indiana is available at: http://www.in.gov/gov/energize/index.html
return to the top of this page
Maine Voters to Consider $60M Bond, Most Targeting TBED
Maine Governor John Baldacci got nearly everything he wanted in a bond proposal to encourage technology-based economic development (TBED). The Maine legislature shaved $10 million from the Governor's original request before passing the bond on to Maine voters for consideration at a special referendum June 10. The bond proposal includes:
- $20 million would re-capitalize the Maine Biomedical Research Fund, managed by the Department of Economic and Community Development. A four-to-one non-state leverage is anticipated from the state's investment to support capital infrastructure and equipment. Gov. Baldacci had wanted $25 million for the fund.
- $3 million to design and construct the Gulf of Maine Research Laboratory to partner with the fishing community on marine research to protect and enhance the commercial fishery of the Gulf of Maine; to partner with the marine biotechnology industry to undertake marine biotechnology research; and to develop and make available an innovative marine sciences education hall focused on middle and secondary school students and the general public.
- $2 million for infrastructure improvements at four advanced technology development centers: the Center for Environmental Enterprise; the Thomas M. Teague Biotechnology Park; the River Valley Technology Center; and the Greenville composite technology center facility.
- $2 million for the Maine Farms for the Future Program. An additional $1 million will go toward infrastructure needs at the University of Maine agricultural research farms.
- $1 million for a Marine Infrastructure and Technology Fund; one-to-one match from non-state funds is required.
- $6 million for the Advanced Engineered Wood Composites Center at the University of Maine to expand research facilities for engineered wood composite structures.
- $3 million for educational technology improvements in the University of Maine system.
- $3.6 million for R&D activities at the university system through the Maine Economic Improvement Fund, which will be used to match federal, foundation and private funds.
- $4.4 million to finish and equip an expansion of the research wing of the science building on the Portland campus of the University of Southern Maine.
An additional $6 million will recapitalize the Municipal Investment Trust Fund to provide grants and loans to municipalities for public facilities and infrastructure, and $8 million, $5 million less than the Governor requested, will go toward housing projects.
Maine voters have looked favorably on several R&D-related bond issues in the past, most recently a $35 million bond issue last summer.
A copy of the bond proposal legislation, LD 1566, is available at: http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/bills/billtexts/LD156602-1.asp
return to the top of this page
HUD 'SuperNOFA' Offers Funding for TBED
The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has notified its partners more than $2.3 billion is available in the FY 2003 SuperNOFA (Notification of Funding Availability), including 43 separate funding opportunities for local units of government and nonprofit faith-based and community organizations. This year's application process ultimately will result in $1.822 billion in targeted housing and homeless assistance, $241 million in community development funding, and $231 million in economic development. Several opportunities of interest to the technology-based economic development (TBED) community are listed below.Approximately $24.84 million is available for the Rural Housing and Economic Development (RHED) program, which aims to build capacity at the state and local level for rural housing and economic development. Funds for this program will be awarded through a selection process conducted by HUD in accordance with HUD Reform Act. Additional funds may be available through recapture. Local rural nonprofit organizations, community development corporations, federally recognized Indian tribes, state housing finance agencies and state economic or community development agencies are eligible to apply. Applications are due by May 27, 2003. http://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/nofa/grprural.cfm
Approximately $54.64 million is available for the Youthbuild program, which assists disadvantaged young adults in distressed communities. Among other objectives, the program seeks to further opportunities for placement in apprenticeship programs and to promote economic self-sufficiency. Eligible applicants are public or private nonprofit agencies, including grassroots faith- and other community-based organizations, state or local housing agencies or authorities, state or units of local government, or any entity eligible to provide education and employment training under other federal employment training programs. Applications are due by June 6, 2003. http://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/nofa/grpyouth.cfm
Additional TBED funding is available for colleges and universities through the two programs below. More information on both is available at: http://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/nofa/grpucp.cfm
- Community Outreach Partnership Centers (COPC) - $6.955 million. Matching funds are required. The COPC Program is designed to assist in establishing or carrying out outreach and applied research activities that address problems of urban areas; and to encourage structural change, both within an institution of higher education and in the way the institution relates to its neighbors. Eligible are public or private nonprofit institutions of higher education granting two- or four-year degrees that are accredited by a national or regional accrediting agency recognized by the U.S. Department of Education. Applications are due June 24, 2003
- Tribal Colleges and Universities (TCUs) - $2.981 million plus approximately $194,552 in previously unexpended FY 2002 funds. The purpose of this program is to help TCUs build, expand, renovate and equip their own facilities, especially those facilities that are used by or available to the larger community. Possible activities might include furnishing small business assistance centers or computer labs. Tribal colleges and universities that meet the definition of a TCU established in Title III of the 1998 Amendments to the Higher Education Act of 1965 are eligible to apply. Institutions must be accredited or state they are a candidate for accreditation by a regional institutional accrediting association recognized by the U.S. Department of Education. Applications are due June 12, 2003.
A total of $550,000 is available for the Early Doctoral Student Research Program (EDSRP) and Doctoral Dissertation Research Grant Program (DDRGP). EDSRP seeks to help doctoral students cultivate their research skills through the preparation of research manuscripts focusing on housing and urban development issues. It also encourages new scholars to share their research findings through presentation at scholarly conferences or publication in refereed journals. The purpose of DDRGP is to assist Ph.D. candidates complete their research and dissertations on housing and urban development issues. Among eligibility requirements, a doctoral student must be a U.S. citizen or resident alien currently enrolled, as a full-time student in at an accredited doctoral program at an accredited institution of higher education. Applications are due by May 27, 2003. http://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/nofa/grpedsddrg.cfm
This year's SuperNOFA also includes everything an applicant needs to prepare their funding request of HUD. For the first time, applicants will no longer be required to seek additional information from the Department that is integral in completing their funding requests. HUD's FY 2003 SuperNOFA is available at: http://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/fundsavail.cfm
return to the top of this page
Venture-backed Women-led Enterprises Perform Well, Springboard Survey Shows
Venture-backed women-led enterprises are moving well beyond start-up stages of corporate formation to revenue generation, and almost 20 percent report profitability, according to Springboard Enterprises, whose program for women entrepreneurs has helped raise $1.76 billion in equity capital for women-led companies.Since Springboard's launch in 2000, 250 women CEOs and founders have participated in the nonprofit organization's pioneering venture programs for women entrepreneurs. Almost 200 of the 250 companies that have presented at Springboard Venture Forums continue to grow, and 97 have raised more than $1 billion in venture capital following their participation in a Springboard Forum.
A recent survey of Springboard Alumnae, conducted by Springboard and McKinsey & Co., shows that 83 responding Springboard companies are generating an average of $3.4 million in revenues, and 19 percent have already achieved positive cash flow or profitability. An additional 16 percent forecast profitability by the end of 2004. Companies reported raising an average of $7.6 million in equity.
According to the survey, a significant 14 percent of Springboard Alumnae companies have broken out of the pack to grow more rapidly. These breakout companies generally demonstrate longer operating histories than their sisters, the data shows. Further highlights include:
- Of 11 companies with annual revenues above $5 million, all but one have five or more years of operations and most were founded by serial entrepreneurs, such as SatisFusion Founder and Chairman Fay Wood.
- One of 20 percent of Springboard Alumnae with more than three previous start-ups, Wood raised more than $15 million in equity and led her four-year-old Long Beach, CA, aftermarket sales and support infrastructure company to profitability.
- A substantial number of Springboard Alumnae (69 percent) are serial entrepreneurs, with 35 percent having three or more entrepreneurial experiences.
More data is available in the Springboard survey results, which can be obtained from Toni Aluisi at taluisi@qorvis.com.
return to the top of this page
Virginia Alliance Sees First Fruits of 2002 Strategic Plan
A strategic plan issued in 2002 by the Fifth Planning District Regional Alliance in Virginia may officially have completed the first phase when the Alliance recently awarded $273,342 in grants and earmarked funds.The Alliance, a group of government, business and educational leaders, promotes economic competitiveness in a Virginia region comprised of Alleghany, Botetourt, Craig, Franklin and Roanoke counties and five other town cities and towns. Its plan, Regional Economic Strategy, was released last July as an economic development strategy focusing heavily on science and technology-based initiatives (see the August 9, 2002 issue of the Digest).
For the 2003 program year, the Alliance's 41-member board of directors distributed funding to four projects:
- The New Century Technology Council (NCTC) was awarded $44,000 to create a targeted campaign to connect individuals who have moved away and college alumni from the region's colleges and universities to job opportunities in the region. NCTC will provide $59,000 in matching funds.
- The Roanoke Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau, receiving $46,000 to market the region, will provide $40,000 in matching funds.
- Dabney S. Lancaster Community College was awarded $33,342 to establish an Entrepreneur Resource Center in the Alleghany Highlands. This effort would help create jobs for individuals who were recently laid off due to the economic downturn. It also would assist unemployed and underemployed individuals by providing them with training and resources to start up their own businesses. The college is providing $24,721 in matching funds.
- The remaining $150,000 will go toward a regional branding project.
Regional Economic Strategy offers insight on the Virginia region's transition between the Knowledge Economy and the New Economy, stressing the importance of a knowledge workforce. For more information on the Alliance or to download the Strategy, visit: http://www.rvarc.org/alliance/
return to the top of this page
Recommended Reading: Understanding and Building Bioregions
Perhaps in no other sector are efforts to grow an industry so dependent on a strong public-private partnership as they are for biotech and the life sciences. Most of the research funding for the field flows from the government to universities and research institutions. Industry then steps up for clinical studies and commercialization.While much that has been covered in the SSTI Weekly Digest on building bio-based economies has focused on local strategic plans and numerous state initiatives, a new paper by Anders Osthol and Johan Lembke for the Regional Innovation and Partnership Project takes a broader look at the role and construct of public-private collaborative relationships for economic development founded on life science growth. With detailed case studies of two North Carolina regions – the well established Research Triangle Park and the nascent efforts of the Piedmont Triad Region – Strategies and Partnerships for Biotech Regions offers recommendations for Sweden that are applicable throughout the Western world.
The findings include:
- Biotech economic development is concentrated in specific geographical areas. Regions are aggressively investing in the biotech sector and are competing for capital, companies, talent and tax revenues. The result is intense competition between regions that adds an important level of competition to that between companies and institutions.
- The regional level and regional partnerships – and the aggregation of biotech assets at the regional level – are gaining increasing legitimacy as true references for economic development and support for the biotech sector, partly as a result of limited pools of available resources and capital.
- The biotech sector realizes the need for concerted state and regional efforts and strong public commitment in biotech economic development. The private sector is working in tandem with various public-private partnerships to mobilize resources.
- Responsibility for developing strategies for the biotech sector is based on and implemented through decentralized and flexible institutional arrangements of cluster enhancement and market-oriented incentive structures.
- Emerging biotech regions are striving to leverage the proximity to more established biotech regions and to develop niche capabilities that complement existing strengths. There is a need to recognize the distinct features of each region and to play to their particular strengths by tailoring approaches to maximize impact.
- The importance of nurturing smaller, high-growth businesses is recognized as a crucial strategy for technology-based economic development in combination with recruiting external investments, companies, and talent from outside the region that complement the existing cluster throughout the value chain.
- Competitiveness and regional advantages are reflected in the innovative capacity to attract venture capital to the region, to mobilize business angels through various types of network organizations, and identify complementarities between venture capital, private equity investment and public investment, all of which are important for early-stage technology-based economic development.
- Governmental agencies fulfill a role in the diffusion of knowledge and technology transfer. Such efforts counterbalance the high degree of concentration in the biotech area, but only to a limited extent. The forces of concentration are strong in terms of capital endowment and start-up capability. Regional strategies are in the process of becoming increasingly important for further dispersion.
In developing their findings and recommendations, Osthol and Lembke also look at the relative advantages of California, Massachusetts and North Carolina, outline challenges for several specific elements of a bio-based economic development strategy, and present arguments for and against state and local government involvement.
The paper is available at the website of the Institutet för Tillväxtpolitiska Studier in Stockholm: http://www.itps.se/pdf/A2003_005.pdf
return to the top of this page
People
Gov. Bill Richardson has appointed his chief of staff, David Harris, to serve as executive director of the New Mexico Finance Authority.Idaho Falls businessman LaMoyne Hyde was appointed by Gov. Dirk Kempthorne to serve as Director of the Idaho Department of Commerce.
Gov. James McGreevey recently appointed Alfred Koeppe as the new Chairman of the Economic Development Authority of New Jersey.
Frank Shafroth has left his position as lobbyist for the National Governors' Association.
Bill Todd, former CEO of the Georgia Research Alliance, has joined the staff of Gov. Sonny Perdue to work on special projects.
Patrick Von Bargen has joined the leadership team in the Office of the Chairman at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as Managing Executive for Policy and Staff. Mr. Von Bargen formerly was Executive Director of the National Center for Regional Innovation and Competitiveness and Vice President of the Council on Competitiveness.
return to the top of this page
Do It For Mom
A Note from the Editor
Don't panic, Mother's Day is still 10 days off. You haven't missed the opportunity to reflect on the contributions she made in your life. Most mothers, at least the good ones, try to instill some basic traits in their children that are critical for the growth and improvement of a better society. Honesty, integrity, respect, consideration, compassion, modesty, and responsibility leap to mind. Remember those struggles as a kid when you knew the right thing to do but didn't want to do it? Like, I remember my mom making me shovel the snow for the old lady who lived alone down the street for free when the rest of the gang were building forts for the best snowball fight of the blizzard of `78. My back ached as I walked up the street — just in time to be pelted by a barrage of snowballs from my buddies.Moms often get a bum rap for having to resort to guilt trips to get us to do the right thing. Most of us have to admit, though, we're better people for all that they did . . . when we do the right thing, that is.
Which gets us to the little matter of responding to the SSTI Weekly Digest readers' survey. You know you should fill it out. You know you read the Digest (you're reading this). And you know the survey is going to be relatively painless. Sure, it may take five minutes of your time, but you know participating really is your responsibility if you appreciate the information in the Digest and Funding Supplement or want to see them improved.
Half of the readers may ignore our pleas for participation. But not you. Your mom didn't raise a shirker or slacker. (I'm not talking to that brother or sister who really hasn't lived up to their potential. I'm talking to you.) No, your mom helped craft you into someone with the integrity, respect and responsibility to do the right thing, to click on the link below and fill out the survey.
When you're done, you'll be able to walk with your head a little higher or sit down in the next staff meeting, feeling pretty good about yourself because you filled out the SSTI Weekly Digest survey and some of them won't have. If only their moms knew! Boy, would they be in trouble.
The survey is available online at: http://www.ssti.org/digestsurvey03.htm [expired].
And when you call, visit, send flowers or think of your mother on May 11. Thank her for us. She raised a good kid.
A couple of closing thoughts
If you already filled out the survey: I'm sorry for making you one of those great kids who had to take the heat with everyone else when it wasn't your fault (yet another time in your life probably). Hopefully you'll understand and forgive me.And, in trying to elicit survey responses over the past 10 days, we've tried to appeal to your sense of humor and sense of duty. Now that we've resorted to playing the mom card, I promise that this is our last plea for your input in the 2003 survey.
return to the top of this page
State Science & Technology Institute
5015 Pine Creek Drive
Westerville, OH 43081
Phone: (614) 901-1690
Fax: (614) 901-1696
Email: ssti@ssti.org© 2003 State Science and Technology Institute. All rights reserved.