In the August 15, 2005 Issue:

Copyright State Science & Technology Institute 2005. Redistribution to all others interested in tech-based economic development is strongly encouraged — please cite the State Science & Technology Institute whenever portions are reproduced or redirected.

Subscription to the SSTI Weekly Digest is free. If you are reading a forwarded copy of this issue and would like to receive your own copy each week directly, please subscribe at http://www.ssti.org/Digest/digform.htm. Requests to unsubscribe also may be completed at http://www.ssti.org/Digest/digform.htm.


Finding Solutions to Cracks in the Basement
If the innovation powerhouse that represents the U.S. economy for the past century were a cinder block foundation of a house, then China and India would present two of the more significant cracks. These two great nations may grab the headlines, but the improved innovation and research capacities of any country provide new challenges for continued U.S. domination of the world's economy. As this week's article on the Czech Republic and Singapore reveals, these are just two more blocks in the U.S. wall to show stress fractures.

"Now, hold on SSTI," you may be saying to yourself. "You want me to lose sleep over the smaller economies, too?" Worry and lose sleep? No. But we do want more people to wake up to what's going on in the basement.

As this week's article on the latest National Science Foundation Issue Brief points out, the continuing decline in foreign students pursing graduate science and engineering degrees may give cause for concern. The U.S. has always been dependent on immigrant talent for science and innovation, but that is likely to become a less reliable strategy as opportunities grow at home for foreign nationals to engage in R&D.

And opportunity is growing abroad, as the Digest has tried to present a few samples from around the world during the past year:

In response to the growing recognition that more needs to be done on the federal level, many of the country's most respected CEOs and organizations have issued papers, plans, strategies and calls to action for an improved national innovation policy. The Digest also has covered many of these during the past nine months, including last week's article on Tapping America's Potential: The Education for Innovation Initiative. In our crumbling foundation analogy, these are the brick masons, concrete experts and foundation restoration specialists telling us what to do: We have to change.

Unfortunately, while most of the focus of these plans is national, the real work of implementing most of a better innovation strategy falls on states and communities across the country. We need to broaden participation in science and entrepreneurship to underrepresented demographic groups such as women and minorities. We need to integrate workforce programs and TBED strategies more closely to prepare a larger knowledge-based talent pool. We need to encourage university-based research and innovation. We need to facilitate private investment for commercializing promising technologies. We need to create a greater sense of regionalism and collaboration to reflect the win-win potential of tech-based economic development (TBED).

Fortunately, most of the Digest readership is up to the task -- or you wouldn't subscribe to this newsletter!

SSTI's conference, to be held Oct. 19-21 in Atlanta, provides the perfect opportunity to learn about what state and local TBED practitioners are doing to take advantage of the opportunities presented by globalization. A quick snapshot of the exciting breakout sessions offered this year is highlighted below. Session times, speaker names and backgrounds are available on SSTI's conference website: http://www.ssti.org/Conf05/schedule.htm

Join your colleagues from across the country as we gather in Atlanta to Invest in a Brighter Future: Building Tech-Based Economies. Early registration ends Sept 17. Online registration is available at: https://www.ssti.org/Conf05/registration.htm

return to the top of the page


Survey Reveals Graduate Student Enrollment Up in S&E, but Declines for Foreign Students
A comprehensive survey of 12,000 departments within 591 institutions of higher education in the U.S. reveals that, in 2003, graduate student enrollment in S&E programs increased by 4 percent over the previous year and 9 percent over the past decade. Foreign student enrollment, however, decreased 8 percent in 2003 after falling 6 percent the year before.

The National Science Foundation InfoBrief reports similar findings to a survey conducted last year by the Council of Graduate Students (CGS) (see the Nov. 8 issue of the Digest). According to the CGS study, which surveyed 450 institutions of higher education, international graduate student applications declined across all major fields of study with the largest drop in engineering, where applications declined 36 percent from 2003 to 2004. In terms of enrollment, engineering also saw the largest decrease ­ 24 percent from the previous year.

Overall declines in first-time, full-time enrollment of foreign students did not occur in all S&E fields, according to the NSF InfoBrief. Declines were seen in agricultural sciences, computer sciences, earth, atmospheric and ocean sciences, and engineering. However, foreign enrollment increased in biological sciences, mathematical sciences, physical sciences, and psychology, the report states.

Other promising findings reveal that overall graduate enrollment grew in all S&E fields and in all subfields except computer sciences, which dropped 3 percent over the previous year. The proportion of women among S&E graduates grew from 36 percent in 1993 to 42 percent a decade later in 2003. The number of male graduate students increased by 4 percent over the previous year. Enrollment of minority students in graduate S&E programs also has grown over the past 10 years.

The NSF InfoBrief, Graduate Enrollment in Science and Engineering Programs Up in 2003, But Declines for First-Time Foreign Students, is available at: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/infbrief/nsf05317/

return to the top of the page


Czech Republic, Singapore to Double R&D Investments
While the U.S. commitment to science is threatened by flattening federal R&D investments, two more countries demonstrate their shared belief that the way to economic prosperity is through science and innovation.

Czech Republic
The Czech Republic has outlined a five-year economic development plan that calls for doubling R&D's share of the gross domestic product by 2010. To achieve that goal requires increasing government spending for science and innovation by 20-25 percent annually, according to Martin Jahn, deputy prime minister for the economy.

The country of 10.2 million people (2005 est.) currently only spends 0.6 percent of its gross domestic product (GDP) on science. The goal is to raise that to 1.3 percent by 2010, still well below the European average of 1.9 percent but ambitious nonetheless for a former Soviet block nation. Government spending will have to increase by at least 2-4 billion Czech korunas (approx. $84.3 million to $168.6 million US) each year for the next five years to meet the goal. [Note to states: This is real money, not borrowed through long-term revenue bonds.]  For 2006, Czech scientists are slated to receive 18.2 billion Czech korunas ($767 million US).

To help encourage innovation, the country also is working to host the World Women Entrepreneurs Congress in 2007, increasing public investment capital availability by 200 million Czech korunas in 2006, and adjusting immigration policy with an "aim to keep young scientists in the Czech Republic," Jahn said.

Singapore
While the Czech Republic is motivated by raising its per capita GDP to the European average, the argument for doubling R&D expenditures in Singapore sounds very similar to those raised by many in the U.S.: the rise of China and India. The Ministerial Committee on Research and Development (MCRD), chaired by Deputy Prime Minister Tony Tan, has outlined a strategy to raise R&D's share of the country's GDP to 3 percent within the next five years.

The plan calls for public investment of $12 billion Singapore ($7.22 billion US) during the next five years in selected technologies areas such as current focus areas of electronics, chemicals and marine engineering, and biomedical sciences. In addition, new focus should be given to environmental and water technologies, and interactive digital media.

Public research investments would be more balanced under the new plan, Tan said, between investigator-led and mission-oriented research. Both academic and industry research sectors would receive increased funding from the national government. The academic research fund will nearly double from $550 million Singapore for fiscal years 2001-2005 to $1.05 billion Singapore for the five-year 2006-2010 planning period.

The final recommendation calls for reorganizing the country's research structure using the models of the Innovation Platform in the Netherlands and the Science and Technology Policy Council of Finland. Singapore's new entity would be called the Research, Innovation and Enterprise Council (REIC). In addition to advising the Cabinet on policy issues, REIC would oversee the establishment of a new $5 billion Singapore National Research Foundation.

In sum, total public sector support for research and innovation in Singapore, a country of 4.4 million people, would rise from $5 billion in FY 2001-2005 to $12 billion during FY 2006-2010 under the plan. MCRD's recommendations are being considered as the national government develops final five-year budget figures, Tan said.

return to the top of the page


Recent Research
The Economic Compass Points Back to the Core

Should policymakers focus on urban core centers as keys to economic growth or seek greater economic equity in the less developed periphery? A new study on regional policy and economic geography suggest policies should be directed toward core growth.

In New Economic Geography, Empirics, and Regional Policy, the authors examine historic development patterns in Europe and test a new geographic model with time series data. Authors Steven Brakman, Harry Garretsen, Joeri Gorter, Albert van der Horst, and Marc Schramm conclude that economic activity quickly balances in favor of existing central clusters regardless of policies. In fact, policies focused on building regional infrastructure, as a way to pull commerce into less developed regions, often results in drawing activity back to core areas over time.

The study highlights the following policy-related conclusions:

The authors also examine industries and found that once established, these industries tend to remain in existing centers over long stretches of time. The data also indicate that the overall concentration of industries in Europe has fallen in relation to services.

Policymakers must navigate between their concerns about equity and their desire for growth. The authors note that efforts to boost competitiveness of lagging regions usually fail to counter the circular, magnetic pull of core clusters. If you favor growth. steer your policies towards existing urban cores.

New Economic Geography, Empirics, and Regional Policy is available at: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cpb:spcial:56&r=all

Links to this paper and more than 1,000 additional TBED-related research reports, strategic plans and other papers can be found at the Tech-based Economic Development (TBED) Resource Center, jointly developed by the Technology Administration and SSTI, at http://www.tbedresourcecenter.org/.

return to the top of the page


People
Arizona State University professor James Collins is the new assistant director for biological sciences at the National Science Foundation.

Larry Cox is the new director of the Ball State University Entrepreneurship Program, effective Aug. 22.

Louisiana Department of Economic Development announced Robert Fudickar will be the technology industry director for the state agency.

Russel Hancock is the new president and CEO of Joint Venture: Silicon Valley.

The U.S. Department of Commerce is promoting Chris Israel to serve as coordinator for international intellectual property enforcement. The new position will coordinate interagency protection efforts to combat international IP piracy.

William "Bill" Mahoney is the new president and CEO of the South Carolina Research Authority.

Joan Myers, president and CEO of Raleigh-based N.C. Technology Association, is the 2005-2007 president for the Council of Regional Information Technology Associations (CRITA).

Alaska Gov. Frank Murkowski appointed Bill Noll as commissioner of the Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development. Noll has been serving as the governor's communications director.

Jack Pfunder is the new executive director of the Manufacturers Resource Center in Bethlehem, Pa.

Pat Snider, the first CEO for BioGenerator in St. Louis, announced her departure from the two-year-old organization by the end of the year.

The new director of the Burton D. Morgan Center for Entrepreneurship at Purdue University will be Jerry Woodall.

President Bush is nominating John Young Jr. to serve as director of Defense Research & Engineering. Young is currently Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition.

return to the top of the page


State Science & Technology Institute
5015 Pine Creek Drive
Westerville, OH  43081
(614) 901-1690

© 2005 State Science and Technology Institute. All rights reserved.