In the
October 29, 2008 Issue:
Copyright
State Science & Technology Institute 2008. Redistribution to
all others interested in tech-based economic development is strongly
encouraged. Please cite the State Science & Technology
Institute whenever portions are reproduced or redirected.
ARCHIVED ISSUES (1996-present): Previous
issues of the SSTI Weekly Digest are available
and searchable on our website:
http://www.ssti.org/Digest/digest.htm
An index of all state and local stories may be found at: http://www.ssti.org/Digest/Indices/indexstate.htm
TO
SUBSCRIBE/UNSUBSCRIBE: Subscriptions to the SSTI
Weekly Digest are free. To subscribe, please visit:
http://www.ssti.org/Digest/subscribe.htm
To unsubscribe,
please visit: http://www.ssti.org/Digest/digform_unsubscribe.htm
Election
Preview: Voters to Decide on Statewide TBED Issues
While the Presidential election takes center stage on November 4,
voters in several states also will cast their votes on statewide ballot
issues affecting the TBED community. In addition to the 11
gubernatorial races and more than 5,800 state legislative seats up for
grabs, voters across the nation will consider measures to provide
funding for public education, expand investment in alternative and
renewable energy, lift restrictions on stem-cell research, and
eliminate income tax and state spending caps. Following is a summary of
selected ballot issues from across the nation.
Funding Public Education
Florida
Florida voters will be asked to amend the state constitution to require
that the legislature authorize counties to levy a local option sales
tax to supplement funding for public community colleges. Ballot
question 8 requires voter approval to levy the tax.
Maryland
A proposal in Maryland asks voters to approve an amendment to the state
constitution authorizing video lottery terminal gaming to provide funds
for public education. Question 2 legalizes up to 15,000 machines at
sites in four counties and the city of Baltimore. HB
4 requires the revenue raised from the video lottery machines
be used for public education in pre-K through grade 12, public school
construction and capital improvements, and construction of capital
projects at community colleges and public senior higher education
institutions.
Energy
California
Voters will decide on two energy-related issues. Proposition
7 requires public and private utilities to generate 20
percent of their power from renewable energy by 2010, 40 percent by
2020 and 50 percent by 2025. The measure additionally speeds the
approval process for new renewable energy plants, requires utilities to
sign longer contracts (20-year minimum) to procure renewable energy,
and creates accounts to purchase rights-of-way and facilities for the
transmission of renewable energy. The state estimates the short term
impact to include a spike in rates leading to higher costs, lower sales
and income tax revenue and higher local utility tax revenues.
Proposition
10 authorizes the state to borrow $10 billion over 30 years
for R&D in alternative fuel technology in order to reduce the
state’s dependence on foreign oil. The proposal calls for $3.4 billion
to help consumers purchase high fuel economy or alternative fuel
vehicles and to fund research into alternative fuel technology, $1.25
billion for R&D and production of renewable energy technology -
primarily solar - and grants to cities for renewable energy projects
and to colleges for training in renewable energy efficiency
technologies. Total funding is $5 billion from general obligation bonds
with another $5 billion in interest.
Missouri
Proposition
C requires investor-owned electric utilities to generate or
purchase electricity from renewable energy sources such as solar, wind,
biomass and hydropower with the renewable energy sources equaling at
least 2 percent of retail sales by 2011. This would increase
incrementally to at least 15 percent by 2021. The measure would not
have an impact on taxes and any rate increase to consumers must be
capped at one percent.
Stem Cell Research
Michigan
Voters will decide on a controversial issue overturning the state’s
ban on stem cell research. Proposal
08-2 amends the state constitution to allow research on
embryonic stem cells created for fertility treatment that would
otherwise be destroyed. The measure additionally prohibits state and
local laws that prevent, restrict or discourage stem cell research,
future therapies and cures.
Taxes
Colorado
A proposal in Colorado aims to eliminate rebates that taxpayers receive
under the taxpayer bill of rights and divert those funds to a new
savings account for public education. Amendment
59 creates a savings account within the State Education Fund
and places 10 percent of income tax revenue that is currently deposited
into the fund into the savings account until it reaches a certain
threshold.
Massachusetts
Massachusetts voters will decide on a measure to eliminate the personal
income tax by 2010. Question
1 on the statewide ballot reduces the state personal income
tax rate to 2.65 percent for the tax year beginning Jan. 1, 2009 and
eliminates the tax for all years after Jan. 1, 2010.
North Dakota
Statutory
Measure 2 reduces individual income tax rates by half and
corporation income tax rates by 15 percent for tax years beginning in
2009. An analysis conducted by the state tax commissioner finds the
measure would reduce state general fund revenues by an estimated $414
million in the 2009-11 biennium.
Oregon
Measure
59 would allow individual taxpayers to deduct the federal
income taxes they pay from their state tax returns. With no general
sales tax collected in the state, Oregon’s state service and public
schools rely on income tax collection. The state estimates a reduction
in state budget revenues by approximately $360 million in the first
year and $1 billion in the second year.
return
to the top of the page
U.S. Bailout of Financial
Sector Also Extends Alternative Energy Incentives
Though
the U.S. Treasury's initial proposal for a bailout of the financial
sector was only three pages when it was first submitted to Congress,
federal legislators did not waste time in expanding its scope. The $700
billion emergency stabilization package, passed early this month,
eventually swelled to more than 400 pages. One of the largest additions
to the bill was a new section extending incentives for alternative and
renewable energy.
These
provisions include an extension of the wind energy Production Tax
Credit and the solar energy Investment Tax Credit, as well as several
other energy credits. In total, the bailout act contains 150 pages of
energy provisions.
The
30 percent investment tax credit for solar, geothermal and fuel cells
was extended through 2016, as was the ten percent credit for
microturbines. New investment credits were introduced for combined heat
and power systems, small commercial wind property and geothermal heat
pump, all of which will stay in effect through 2017. A new provision
allows public utility property to beeligible for the credit, and the
credit may now be used to reduce the alternative minimum tax for
certain taxpayers.
The
wind Production Tax Credit (PTC), the largest of the PTCs, was only
extended through next year, but a variety of other power-generation
methods received extensions through 2011. This included producers of
electricity from closed- and open-loop biomass, geothermal, small
irrigation power, municipal solid waste, trash combustion and qualified
hydropower. A new PTC for marine and hydrokinetic renewable energy has
also been added.
The
termination date for existing clean renewable energy bonds has been
pushed back until the end of 2009. Under the act’s provisions, $800
million in new funding for these bonds has been approved, and can be
used to finance facilities for wind, closed-loop biomass, open-loop
biomass, geothermal, small irrigation, qualified hydropower, landfill
gas, marine renewable and trash combustion-base power. Local
government-led conservation and greenhouse gas reduction projects will
be able to benefit from new qualified energy conservation bonds
authorized through the bailout bill.
A
breakdown of the bailout bill’s energy provisions is available at: http://www.nixonpeabody.com/publications_detail1.asp?ID=2443
The
full Emergency Economic Stabilization Act (H.R. 1424) is available on http://thomas.loc.gov/.
return
to the top of the page
Vermont Rolls Out New
Initiative to Spur Software Industry
Gov. Jim
Douglas recently announced Vermont will roll out a suite of grants and
incentives to strengthen the state’s software industry. The initiative
includes state-funded low-interest loans to software businesses,
employment growth incentives and a tax credit for software research. In
his unveiling of the software initiative at Champlain College’s new
Emergent Media Center, Gov. Douglas explained that state agencies will
use these new measures in conjunction with the Center to help build a
local software development cluster.
Under
the new initiative, the state will provide $150,000 to the Vermont
Center for Emerging Technologies to support student entrepreneurs. The
money will fund three low-interest loans to help state university and
college students start new software design companies. A $47,000 grant
to the Vermont Software Developers Alliance, the statewide software
trade association, will help provide support for existing
businesses.
Gov.
Douglas also announced his intention to expand Vermont’s Employment
Growth Incentive. The change will expand the cash incentive to
companies that create new software jobs. Vermont’s Department of Labor
will start giving priority to software and related technology firms in
coming rounds of awards. Also, the state will introduce a new
R&D tax credit that mirrors the federal R&D tax credit
at the state level.
Read
the Governor’s press release on the software initiative at: http://governor.vermont.gov/tools/index.php?topic=GovPressReleases&id=3181&v=Article
return
to the top of the page
AURP
Promotes Nationwide
Place-Based Innovation Zones
The U.S.
should create a nationwide network of innovation zones which gather the
capabilities of entities such as research parks, technology incubators,
universities, and federal laboratories according to a recent report
from the Association of University Research Parks (AURP). The
Power of
Place: A National Strategy for Building America’s Communities of
Innovation, recommends coupling distinct federal policies,
regulatory
reforms, and incentives along with these research and commercialization
clusters to accelerate their impact.
The report contends the U.S. is losing human capital and its
competitive position to other foreign governments which are providing
incentives and employing place-based technology development strategies.
Because of this changing global landscape, only one of the ten largest
research parks in the world – the Research Triangle Park in North
Carolina – is located in the U.S. And a new model of research parks is
emerging, where commercial and residential space, multi-tenant
buildings, and sustainable design concepts merge with a diverse
collection of participating institutions (see the Nov. 28,
2007 special issue of the Digest on planning innovation
spaces).
Recommended in the report is the launch of a federal government program
to establish these innovation zones across the U.S., based on national
priorities such as energy and homeland security, which would also
require matching grants from the states, local government and private
industry for their establishment. Other policy recommendations include:
- Reform
current federal restrictions on negotiating corporate IP property
rights for research performed in facilities funded through tax-exempt
bonds;
- Provide
incentives from the federal government for start-up companies locating
in these innovation zones to be awarded contracts and grants from SBIR,
STTR, and NIST’s new TIP initiative;
- Target
these innovation zones for federal lab expansions;
- Offer
enhanced benefits for companies that perform research in these
innovation zones, such as research and development tax credits;
- Expand
the leasing authority of federal agencies to create innovation zones
adjacent to federal laboratories; and,
- Provide
incentives to build mixed-use space and encourage density in innovation
zones located in urban areas.
The
Power of Place: A National Strategy for Building America’s Communities
of Innovation can be accessed at: http://www.aurp.net/meet/power_of_place.cfm
return
to the top of the page
Useful
Stats: Funding Provided by NIH Grants per State, 2002-2006
In the 2002 report Signs
of Life: The Growth of Biotechnology Centers in the U.S.,
Joseph Cortright and Heike Mayer suggested it would take more than a
decade for biotech investment strategies to yield fruit - as
measured by NIH funding and biocommercialization efforts. On the state
level, with five years of NIH research funding data now available, some
states can boast real percentage and actual dollar changes in the
amount of NIH funding captured.
Since total NIH funding peaked during the 2002-2006 period before
beginning several years of nongrowth or decline in actual awards made,
the gains in some states means other states saw declines.
SSTI has prepared a table showing the yearly total amount from NIH
grants directed to each state from 2002 to 2006, the percent change
over that period, and the rank of that change. The total amount of NIH
grants in the U.S. in 2002 was $18.9 billion, gradually increasing
every year to $23.1 billion in 2005. In 2006, this amount fell to $20.8
billion.
View the table at: http://www.ssti.org/Digest/Tables/102908t.htm
Among the states, five had totals larger than $1 billion in
2006: California at $3.1 billion, Massachusetts at $2.2
billion, New York at $1.9 billion, Pennsylvania at $1.4 billion, and
Texas at $1.1 billion.
From 2002 to 2006, West Virginia experienced the largest percent
increase in NIH funding – 48.1 percent – from $15.2 million in 2002 to
$22.6 million in 2006. South Dakota, Louisiana, Kentucky, and Nebraska
finished out the top five in percent increases over this period.
Twenty-six of the states experienced increases larger than 10 percent
from 2002 to 2006.
Eleven states and the District of Columbia experienced a percentage
decrease in NIH funding during the five year period. It is
interesting to note, none of those 12 states had significant statewide
biotechnology initiatives in place during the study period.
To see the state breakouts for NIH grants going back to 1998, which
includes the projects funded for each Congressional district, visit: http://report.nih.gov/award/trends/State_Congressional/StateOverview.cfm
return
to the top of the page
TBED
People
Southern
Growth hired Ted
Abernathy, Jr., former Executive Vice President & COO
of the Research Triangle Regional Partnership, to serve as its
Executive Director, filling the vacancy created by Jim Clinton's
resignation in September.
The Minnesota Center for
Engineering & Manufacturing Excellence has hired Ronald
Bennett as executive director.
The City of Virginia
Beach Economic Development Department has hired Scott
Hall to fill their newly created position of Business
Development Coordinator.
Marquette University
has named Keith Osterhage as executive director for
its office of research and sponsored programs.
Mary Jo Waits is the new Director for NGA Center for
Best Practices' Social, Economic & Workforce Programs Division
within the National
Governors Association.
Dennis Yablonsky, secretary of the Pennsylvania
Dept. of Community
& Economic Development resigned effective Oct. 23.
New Jersey Gov. Jon Corzine named Jerold Zaro as
Chief of the Governor's
Office of Economic Growth.
Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm has reorganized the Department of Labor and
Economic Growth and changed the department’s name to the
Department of Energy, Labor and Economic Growth. Stanley
(Skip) Pruss,
currently the governor's energy advisor will serve as the new CEO and
director of the renamed department. Pruss replaces current Director/CEO
Keith Cooley, who, in early November, will become the new president and
CEO of the NextEnergy Center, the state’s renewable energy industry
accelerator.
return
to the top of the page
<#UNSUBSCRIBE#>
State
Science & Technology Institute
5015 Pine Creek Drive
Westerville, OH 43081
(614) 901-1690
© 2008 State Science
and Technology Institute. All rights reserved.