Do Low Taxes Lead to Entrepreneurial Growth?
State |
Small Business Survival
Index Ranking |
Entrepreneurial Energy
as defined by |
||||
New Company Starts |
Change in New Companies (3) |
New Business Job Growth (4) |
Technology Companies (5) |
Initial Public Offerings (6) |
||
Alabama |
8 |
41 |
34 | 21 | 37 | 38 |
Alaska |
14 |
13 |
33 | 41 | 38 | 8 |
Arizona |
20 |
29 |
38 | 5 | 13 | 31 |
Arkansas |
25 |
45 |
46 | 47 | 46 | 32 |
California |
44 |
2 |
13 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
Colorado |
11 |
3 |
42 | 6 | 2 | 12 |
Connecticut |
33 |
31 |
37 | 50 | 5 | 17 |
Delaware |
29 |
9 |
36 | 13 | 22 | 41 |
Florida |
5 |
10 |
6 | 8 | 19 | 20 |
Georgia |
23 |
15 |
29 | 24 | 15 | 1 |
Hawaii |
49 |
27 |
47 | 48 | 40 | 26 |
Idaho |
26 |
7 |
16 | 3 | 42 | 35 |
Illinois |
13 |
43 |
15 | 34 | 10 | 13 |
Indiana |
16 |
44 |
23 | 39 | 29 | 36 |
Iowa |
39 |
50 |
43 | 16 | 48 | 41 |
Kansas |
47 |
30 |
4 | 37 | 27 | 21 |
Kentucky |
32 |
38 |
19 | 4 | 41 | 40 |
Louisiana |
19 |
33 |
35 | 45 | 33 | 41 |
Maine |
48 |
11 |
32 | 43 | 29 | 6 |
Maryland |
27 |
17 |
39 | 18 | 5 | 14 |
Massachusetts |
21 |
35 |
41 | 19 | 1 | 3 |
Michigan |
12 |
32 |
7 | 21 | 19 | 11 |
Minnesota |
46 |
46 |
45 | 30 | 9 | 23 |
Mississippi |
9 |
39 |
22 | 26 | 47 | 22 |
Missouri |
17 |
36 |
27 | 10 | 33 | 4 |
Montana |
38 |
8 |
12 | 33 | 42 | 30 |
Nebraska |
31 |
47 |
26 | 39 | 44 | 41 |
Nevada |
1 |
4 |
18 | 9 | 14 | 24 |
New Hampshire |
7 |
12 |
50 | 15 | 4 | 25 |
New Jersey |
37 |
20 |
31 | 27 | 3 | 16 |
New Mexico |
45 |
28 |
44 | 38 | 25 | 41 |
New York |
43 |
18 |
20 | 36 | 22 | 2 |
North Carolina |
35 |
19 |
3 | 23 | 29 | 27 |
North Dakota |
24 |
48 |
21 | 35 | 50 | 41 |
Ohio |
40 |
49 |
30 | 31 | 17 | 37 |
Oklahoma |
28 |
21 |
8 | 29 | 17 | 7 |
Oregon |
36 |
14 |
49 | 13 | 21 | 19 |
Pennsylvania |
22 |
37 |
17 | 32 | 22 | 10 |
Rhode Island |
50 |
15 |
5 | 44 | 25 | 34 |
South Carolina |
18 |
23 |
9 | 28 | 38 | 39 |
South Dakota |
2 |
40 |
24 | 42 | 49 | 41 |
Tennessee |
10 |
25 |
25 | 25 | 36 | 29 |
Texas |
6 |
34 |
40 | 12 | 12 | 9 |
Utah |
34 |
5 |
14 | 1 | 11 | 28 |
Vermont |
42 |
24 |
48 | 11 | 28 | 41 |
Virginia |
15 |
22 |
28 | 17 | 8 | 18 |
Washington |
3 |
1 |
10 | 2 | 16 | 15 |
West Virginia |
41 |
26 |
1 | 46 | 44 | 41 |
Wisconsin |
30 |
42 |
2 | 20 | 29 | 33 |
Wyoming |
4 |
6 |
11 | 49 | 33 | 41 |
Notes of Sources
1. Small Business Survival Index 2001: http://www.sbsc.org -- 17 factors are used to develop the overall rankings: personal income taxes, capital gains taxes, corporate income taxes, property taxes, sales taxes, estate taxes, unemployment taxes, health insurance taxes, electricity costs, workers' compensation costs, crime rates, right-to-work status, number of government employees, tax limitation status, Internet taxes, gas taxes, and state minimum wages.
Columns 2-6 are from the Development Report Card for the States: 2000 The descriptions and sources listed below are taken directly from the web version of the report. The "we" reference is to the Corporation for Enterprise Development.
2. New Companies
New company formation is one of the principle ways we measure entrepreneurial
energy. New firms are defined as those that seek new account numbers from state
employment services. Measure: Number of companies applying for new employment
service account numbers, 1998, per 1,000 1998 workers. Source: U.S. Small Business
Administration, Office of Advocacy, from the Council of Economic Advisers, Economic
Indicators, March 1998 and March 1999 and the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
3. Change in New Companies
This measure examines the trend in new company formations on a year-to-year
basis.
Measure: Percentage of change in companies applying for new employment service
account numbers, from 1997 to 1998. Source: U.S. Small Business Administration,
Office of Advocacy, from the Council of Economic Advisers, Economic Indicators,
March 1998 and March 1999 and the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
4. New Business Job Growth
A good indicator of the impact of entrepreneurship in a state is the job
growth associated with relatively young businesses. This measure gives a picture
of the influence of local entrepreneurs on a state economy through the creation
of new jobs. Measure: Percent growth in employment at firms less than five years
old, 1993-1998. Source: David Burch, Jan Gundersen, Anne Haggerty, and William
Parsons. Who's Creating Jobs? Cognetics, Inc. Cambridge, MA: 1999.
5. Technology Companies
The size of this sector creates more opportunities for clustering, agglomeration
economies, and dynamic interactions that increase the chances of producing commercially
successful companies. Measure: Percentage of business establishments that are
technology companies, 1997. Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the
Census. County Business Patterns, 1997. Washington D.C.: 2000.
6. Initial Public Offerings
The number and/or value of initial public offerings is an excellent indicator
of the growth potential of these small companies. The rate and value of IPOs
reflects the competitiveness of the state's small business sector. While many
innovative and successful companies choose to remain under private ownership,
companies that tap into the vast capital resources of the financial markets
generate the largest absolute gains in employment and revenue. Measure: Proceeds
of initial public offering, per business establishment, in dollars.
1999. Source: 1999 IPO Activity by State. Thomson Financial Securities Data.
Accessed
July 2000.
State
Science & Technology Institute
5015 Pine Creek Drive
Westerville, OH 43081
Phone: (614) 901-1690
Fax: (614) 901-1696
Email: ssti@ssti.org
© 2002 State Science and Technology Institute. All rights reserved.