SSTI Digest

The European Commission's 2001 European Innovation Scoreboard, characterizing the strengths and weaknesses in the capacity for innovation of the European Union (EU) and its member states, shows the EU continues to lag behind the U.S. and Japan. 



Released October 1, the scoreboard uses 17 indicators to rate each member state's capacity for encouraging innovative business and improving the competitiveness of their industry through innovation. The aspects of the innovation process measured by the scoreboard are: 



Availability and the use made of people with the right skills, using figures including the supply of new scientists and engineers and the percentage of the workforce employed in technology sectors of industry. 



Creation of new ideas, based on figures for R&D expenditure and patent applications. 

Whether it's called clusters or localization economies, the aggregation of firms in the same or closely related industries has captured the attention of many state and local tech-based economic development efforts. Understanding the phenomenon and formulating effective public policy to encourage or support clustering presents challenges for practitioners and researchers alike. 

A new biotech-opolis in Quebec soon may serve as one of the best organized business centers for biotech, biopharmaceutical, and biocomputer companies in the world, government leaders hope. The Quebec government, Investissement Quebec, the City of Laval, Laval Technopole and Institut national de la recherche re scientifique (INRS), are investing $250 million over five years in cash, in-kind donations, and forgone tax revenues to support the massive cluster project. Additional partners include various academic, economic and scientific communities in metropolitan Montreal and Laval.

Imagine President Bush using his entire State of the Union Address to present a $23 billion five-year strategy to encourage research, innovation, and entrepreneurship in the country. While it has not received much press in the United States, the equivalent happened when Australian Prime Minister John Howard gave his annual Federation Address on January 29.



Backing Australia’s Ability: An Innovation Action Plan for the Future is the Howard government’s comprehensive strategy to strengthen the Commonwealth’s position in the global economy. The five-year price tag to the government for the new initiatives is 2.9 billion Australian dollars (US equivalent is $1.56 billion). An additional $6 billion ($3.23 billion US equivalent) in private investment is expected to be generated from the plan. In 2000-01, the country of only 19.3 million people spent $4.5 billion ($2.43 billion U.S. equivalent) on research and innovation programs.

Why do some start-up technology businesses choose to directly commercialize their innovations, taking on the industry titans as is common in the electronics industry, while other new tech firms, such as those involved in biotechnology, choose a path of cooperation with the industry leaders, commercializing through licenses, joint ventures, and outright acquisition? The answer(s) should help economic development practitioners and science and technology policy makers design the most effective strategies for technology-based entrepreneurial assistance.

Last week, Mary Harney, Ireland’s Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment, announced the establishment of a £560m ($681M U.S.) Technology Foresight Fund to establish Ireland as a location for world class research excellence in niche areas within biotechnology and information and communication technologies. According to Reuters’ reports, funding for the new initiative will be spread over seven years. The Technology Foresight Fund — the country’s single largest investment ever for research, technological development and innovation — was conceived and designed by the Irish Council for Science, Technology, and Innovation (ICSTI), a publicly created organization to advise the Irish government on the strategic direction of science, technology and innovation policy. Separate Task Force panels or subcommittees investigated technology development issues in eight industrial sectors: natural resources; chemicals/pharmaceuticals; health and life sciences; information and communications technology; materials and manufacturing; transport and logistics; construction/infrastructure; and energy.

Eisenhower Exchange Fellowships announces a competition for U.S. citizens in leadership positions with significant professional experience (10-20 years) for Fellowships to:

• Hungary: Technology in education, economy, and communications; and, 
• Malaysia: Computer technology and systems in education; science and technology policy; and, telecommunications policy.

Fellows will meet with top level authorities in government and business throughout the country for a period of 4-10 weeks.  Benefits include all travel costs and living allowance for Fellow and spouse.

Applications are due November 30, 1998. Applications may be requested from: J. Hartl, Eisenhower Exchange Fellowships, 256 S 16th St, Philadelphia, PA 19102; e-mail: jhartl@eef.org; and, fax 215/546-4567.

Former Ohio Governor Richard F. Celeste was sworn in as the United States Ambassador to India last week. Celeste has been a leader in the field of technology-based economic development for the last 15 years. While governor, Celeste established Ohio's Thomas Edison Program.

Since leaving office in 1991, he has played a key role in advancing state-federal cooperation in the area of science and technology. Among other positions, Celeste served as chairman of Carnegie Commission on Science, Technology, and Government's Task Force on Science and Technology and the States; co-chairman of the State-Federal Technology Partnership Task Force; and as vice chairman of the State Science and Technology Institute's Board of Trustees.

His support, encouragement, and counsel will be missed by the SSTI staff, who wish him well in his new post.