SSTI Digest

Initial public offerings (IPOs), the darlings of the dot-com boom, would be put on the endangered species list if they were a plant or animal — based on how few have been seen in the past year. Investor sentiment toward IPOs has been almost as negative since the bubble burst as the IT hype was positive before. But is the aversion to IPOs warranted? Have IPOs really become more risky than they were in years past?

Stavros Peristiani of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York takes on the issue in his recent report, Evaluating the Riskiness of Initial Public Offerings: 1980-2000, and concludes yes, IPOs are more risky, but the blame cannot fully lie with the information and telecommunication technology explosion. Also, and perhaps more surprising for the tech-based economic development community, Peristani's models suggest "companies taken public by top-tier underwriters or funded by venture capital exhibit higher relative volatility and a lower likelihood of survival."

A bill that includes $20 billion for state fiscal relief was to be voted on by U.S. senators Thursday, according to the Federal Funds Information for States (FFIS), a joint subscription service of the National Governors' Association and the National Conference of State Legislatures.

Half of the $20 billion State Fiscal Relief Fund would come through an increase in the federal share of Medicaid. The remainder would be divided 60/40 between state and local governments if S. 1054, the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003, is enacted.

The $20 billion in fiscal relief, to be spread over fiscal years 2003-2004, could go toward education or job training, health care services, transportation or other infrastructure, law enforcement or public safety, and other essential government services.

Whether it is oil, gas, logging or fishing, only one other state in the nation, Alaska, is as dependent on natural resource extraction as Wyoming. Using tech-based economic development to diminish the impact of the boom and bust cycles experienced by all "colonial" economies to diversify the state's economy has been one of the goals of Alaska's gubernatorial leaders since 1988, with the creation and continuation of the Alaska Science and Technology Foundation (ASTF).

The decision 15 years ago to provide ASTF with an initial $6 million appropriation and a $100 million endowment, which has generated more than $120 million in income, was significant and unique. It also was gutsy for a state that depends heavily each year on Congressional pork and doles out $1,500 dividend checks to each resident from the interest earned on the state's $24 billion permanent fund from oil sales.

The continuous decline of venture capital investing persisted in the First Quarter 2003 with total investments of $3.8 billion, down from the prior quarter of $4.3 billion, according to the latest PricewaterhouseCoopers/Thomson Venture Economics/National Venture Capital Association MoneyTree™ Survey. A total of 623 companies received funding in the first quarter compared to 726 companies in the fourth quarter of last year. Industry leaders cited the uncertainty associated with the war in Iraq and the lackluster economy as prime contributors to the cautious investment pace.

Venture capital investing fell sharply starting in 2001 after the correction in the public markets and has steadily drifted downward ever since. In terms of dollars, investment in the first quarter of 2003 was the lowest since the third quarter of 1997. The number of companies receiving funding was the lowest since the third quarter of 1996.

To help build the state's technology sectors, Governor Jeb Bush and the State Board of Education have selected Florida's first three Centers of Excellence. The Centers are designed to foster innovative, cutting-edge technology research at Florida’s colleges and universities, develop commercially viable applications for that research, and recruit high-tech industries and thinkers to the state.

The three projects are:

The National Association of Regional Councils (NARC) is holding on June 4 its fourth telecast on economic development. NARC is a nonprofit membership organization that assists regional councils and metropolitan planning organizations nationwide. Its telecast, "Three Rural Economic Development Strategies," will feature Dr. David Sampson, Assistant Secretary of Commerce, and Mark Drabenstott, Vice President of the Kansas City Federal Reserve to discuss economic development in rural areas. Ernesto Sirolli, founder of the Sirolli Institute, also will be discussing creative entrepreneur strategies. The telecast airs at 3 p.m. For more information, visit http://www.narc.org and click on Economic Development in the left frame.