SSTI Digest

The Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI) of the U.S. Department of Education is currently embarking on a new and challenging agenda designed to enhance the quality and usefulness of educational research for improved teaching and learning. To help shape and lead this effort, the agency is seeking exceptionally qualified individuals to direct four of its five National Research Institutes. The positions fall within the classification of Supervisory, Education Research Analyst (GS 15) with an annual compensation range of $84,638 to $110,028. Each Institute Director reports directly to the Assistant Secretary of Educational Research and Improvement. More information can be found at:

http://www.ed.gov/offices/OERI/dirvacancies.html 

Despite the stock market's rocky ride last Spring, the PricewaterhouseCoopers MoneyTreeTM survey for the second quarter of 2000 found investments of $19.58 billion, climbing 14 percent over the first quarter results. The total number of deals only rose by one percent to 1,432, resulting in the average investment size growing by 13 percent to $13.67 million. 

Saying Congress is threatening to stall "our progress toward our shared national goals and toward balance in a healthy R&D portfolio," Neil Lane, Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, has issued a mid-summer status report on the FY 2001 R&D appropriations. The report outlines the effect of the current appropriation scenario on the President's civilian R&D goals, collectively marketed as the 21st Century Research Fund. An agency-by-agency break out is provided of congressional funding levels versus the President's FY 2001 requests. The brief report and accompanying letter from Lane can be found at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/WH/EOP/OSTP/html/00810.html 

Congress will consider the budget appropriations when it returns after Labor Day from its August recess. 

Using the microsystems industry in the Southwest as a model, Ross DeVol, Director of Regional and Demographic Studies of the Milken Institute, has written Blueprint for a High-Tech Cluster, a 40-page policy brief on one of the hottest trends for tech-based economic development. Recognizing the importance of technology and knowledge in the New Economy, and that "knowledge is generated, transmitted and shared more efficiently in close proximity," DeVol asserts that those regions with leading clusters in key technologies will enjoy greater economic growth and stability. "Success in creating high-tech clusters is now the distinguishing determinant in regional vitality," states DeVol. 

Blueprint outlines and describes ten specific strategies for developing a high-tech cluster: 

Using patent filing and quality as a measure of innovation, “a dollar of venture capital appears to be about three times more potent in stimulating patenting than a dollar of traditional corporate R&D,” according to a July 2000 paper by Samuel Korton (Boston University) and Josh Lerner (Harvard University). The authors report in Assessing the Contribution of Venture Capital to Innovation that, although venture capital averaged less than three percent of corporate R&D from 1983-1992, it was responsible for almost eight percent of US industrial innovations during the same time period. 

With the rapid expansion of the research budget for the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the high profile role of biotechnology in the New Economy, concerns have been raised in Congress as to whether or not NIH was keeping up on licensing and royalties. At the request of Congressmen Tom Bliley and Fred Upton, the General Accounting Office (GAO) has reviewed NIH’s internal controls. The results, reported in Financial Management: Improvements Needed in NIH’s Control over Royalty Income (GAO/AIMD-00-210), are less than positive: 

Americans say they take pride in our nation's leadership role in science and technology and believe the U.S. needs to continue investing in scientific research and development (R&D) in order to remain at the forefront of discovery and innovation, according to a Gallup survey conducted on behalf of the Bayer Corporation in partnership with the National Science Foundation. At the same time, many Americans also expressed concern about whether our educational system is preparing students for the challenges that accompany new technologies. 

The results of The Bayer Facts of Science Education VI: Americans' Views on Science, Technology, Education and the Future are consistent with the flurry of state S&T activities over the past twelve months and may help provide some directional push for future initiatives: