Skip to main content
Skip to main content
State Science & Technology Institute (SSTI) logo

Secondary Menu

  • Events
    • Educational Opportunities
    • Annual Conference
    • Webinars
    • Past Events
  • Advocacy
    • Innovation Advocacy Council
    • Policy Statements
  • Job Corner
  • Sign In
  • Search

Main menu

  • About SSTI
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Team
    • Contact Us
    • TBED Community of Practice
  • Membership
    • Why Join
    • Join/Renew
    • Member List
  • Resources
    • Digest Articles
    • Useful Stats
    • Recent Research
    • Webinar Library
  • Funding
    • Funding Supplement
    • Federal Funding Video library
  • Join SSTI
  • Sign up for SSTI Digest

Search

Displaying 1 - 1 of 1
Authored on

Useful Stats: NIH SBIR/STTR Success Rates by State (2008-2017)

Thursday, January 3, 2019

One of the best ways to measure the effectiveness of state programs intended to encourage the success of SBIR applications is the approval-rate of their submissions. Although this data has been historically unavailable across every federal agency, it is now accessible for the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the second largest provider of SBIR/STTR awards, according to a 2018 Digest report. The NIH distributed $446.2 million in SBIR/STTR awards in 2017, with every state except North and South Dakota receiving an award. Although California and Massachusetts had the most successful SBIR/STTR applications in 2017, accounting for roughly one-third of the total when combined, neither state ranked among the top 10 in success rate. NIH SBIR/STTR applications in Oregon (29 percent success rate), Vermont (25 percent success rate), and Wisconsin (23 percent success rate) were the most likely to be approved over the ten-year period from 2008 to 2017. Each of these states, as well as many others with high success rates, offer assistance with proposals such as technical support programs and Phase 0 grants.

  • Read more about Useful Stats: NIH SBIR/STTR Success Rates by State (2008-2017)

Tags

Select up to 5
  • (-) NIH (1)
  • (-) SSTI features (1)
  • SBIR (1)
  • useful stats (1)

Recent news from the SSTI Digest

Recent Research: What makes place-based economic development policies work?

Wednesday, September 9, 2026
Place-based economic development is back near the center of federal policy, from Opportunity Zones to the CHIPS and Science Act. That renewed attention comes with a familiar problem: decades of enterprise zones, tax incentives, infrastructure investments, and other geographically targeted programs have produced results that are hard to summarize cleanly. In a new NBER working paper, Matthew Freedman and David Neumark ask the better question: not simply whether or not these policies work, but under what conditions they might work, for whom, and why. Their review points to a practical conclusion: policy design matters and targeting a distressed community with development-focused financial incentives is rarely enough on its own.
economic development

A BBBRC grant builds momentum for a highly trained semiconductor workforce

Wednesday, September 9, 2026
For the civic leaders of Osceola County, the Great Recession of 2008 made clear that they could not base their economy so heavily on travel and tourism. By the time COVID-19 hit in 2020, they knew the steps they had taken to diversify their economy were the right ones. When the Build Back Better Regional Challenge (BBBRC) opportunity arose in 2021, the county and its partners were well-positioned to operationalize the benefits the grant presented to the region and create a trained workforce for a recently attracted semiconductor industry. How did Osceola County get here? There are potential approaches to emulate by more areas of the county dependent on low-wage sectors like tourism or, for that matter, extraction-focused regions subject to “boom and bust.” 
semiconductors
workforce

The impact of tax incentives on early-stage company investment varies

Wednesday, September 9, 2026
One persistent question in economic development policy is how incentives impact private sector investment decisions. Recent and ongoing research from Murillo Campello and Guilherme Junqueira of the University of Florida, published in the National Bureau of Economic Research working paper series, explores the impact of the Qualified Small Business Stock (QSBS) program on venture capital risk-taking. The researchers found that the availability of QSBS tax benefits strongly influences venture capital investment behavior, specifically in traditionally structured venture capital funds. They also found no similar behavior among angel or corporate investors, an insight that may hold important program design and policy lessons for the TBED community. 
tax incentives
investing
State Science & Technology Institute (SSTI) logo

Footer

  • About
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Membership
    • TBED Community of Practice
  • Join
    • Member Benefits
    • Member List
  • Join SSTI
  • Sign up for SSTI Digest

© 2025 SSTI, All Rights Reserved.

1391 W 5th Avenue Ste 323, Columbus OH 43212

614.901.1690