Skip to main content
Skip to main content
State Science & Technology Institute (SSTI) logo

Secondary Menu

  • Events
    • Educational Opportunities
    • Annual Conference
    • Webinars
    • Past Events
  • Advocacy
    • Innovation Advocacy Council
    • Policy Statements
  • Job Corner
  • Sign In
  • Search

Main menu

  • About SSTI
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Team
    • Contact Us
    • TBED Community of Practice
  • Membership
    • Why Join
    • Join/Renew
    • Member List
  • Resources
    • Digest Articles
    • Useful Stats
    • Recent Research
    • Webinar Library
  • Funding
    • Funding Supplement
    • Federal Funding Video library
  • Join SSTI
  • Sign up for SSTI Digest

Search

Displaying 1 - 8 of 8
Authored on

Congress to fund Commerce and Science agencies in first half of FY 2024 action

Thursday, March 7, 2024

More than five months into fiscal year 2024, Congress has approved an agreement covering six of the twelve annual appropriations bills. Many tech-based economic development (TBED) programs received funding equal to the FY 2023 base appropriation—a strong sign of support for a year in which Congress agreed to return to FY 2022 overall spending levels and many programs across the federal government, therefore, saw cuts.

  • Read more about Congress to fund Commerce and Science agencies in first half of FY 2024 action

Final FY 2018 budget increases Regional Innovation, MEP, NSF

Thursday, March 22, 2018

With final passage and signage pending at the time of publication, the federal budget for FY 2018 provides relatively strong support for innovation economies. The Regional Innovation Strategies program is funded at $21 million, MEP at $140 million and the National Science Foundation at $7.8 billion, increases for all organizations. Other notable innovation programs receiving at least level funding are SBA’s cluster and accelerator programs, DOE’s ARPA-E, NASA science and the National Institutes of Health.

  • Read more about Final FY 2018 budget increases Regional Innovation, MEP, NSF

Senate Appropriations advances FY 2018 spending bills, would fund Regional Innovation at $21 million

Thursday, July 27, 2017

Over the past week, the U.S. Senate Committee on Appropriations has passed bills to fund commerce and science, transportation, energy and water and agriculture. Regional Innovation Strategies would be funded at $21 million, an increase of $4 million over FY 2017. Other innovation proposals received mixed support, as the Senate cut $3.2 billion from commerce, justice and science funding and another $400 million from agriculture.

  • Read more about Senate Appropriations advances FY 2018 spending bills, would fund Regional Innovation at $21 million

US House appropriations bills would make major cuts to innovation

Thursday, June 29, 2017

The House Appropriations Committee began releasing FY 2018 “markup” budget bills this week, and the proposals would cut billions in non-defense spending. EDA would lose $100 million* in funding, SBA’s entrepreneurial development programs would lose $34 million, NIST’s Manufacturing Extension Partnership would lose $30 million, and Energy’s ARPA-E would be eliminated, among other cuts.

  • Read more about US House appropriations bills would make major cuts to innovation

Highlights from the President's FY 2018 Budget Request: National Science Foundation

Friday, May 26, 2017

The president’s FY 2018 budget proposal for the National Science Foundation (NSF) would provide $6.7 billion – a $840.9 million (11.2 percent) decrease in funding.

  • Read more about Highlights from the President's FY 2018 Budget Request: National Science Foundation

Highlights from the President's FY15 National Science Foundation Budget Request

Thursday, March 6, 2014

The president’s FY15 budget proposal for the National Science Foundation (NSF) would provide $7.3 billion (1.2 percent increase). Of that amount, $5.8 billion (no change) would be designated for research and related activities, $200.8 million (0.4 percent increase) for R&D facilities and equipment, and $889.8 million (5.2 percent increase) for education and training. Nearly 90 percent of NSF funding is awarded through a merit review process that includes distribution of grants and cooperative agreements.

  • Read more about Highlights from the President's FY15 National Science Foundation Budget Request

Defense, Health Lead in Federal R&D Funding

Wednesday, August 1, 2012

The National Science Foundation (NSF) has released a breakdown of federal research and development (R&D) funding by research area. The report includes FY10 spending, FY11 preliminary spending levels and proposed FY12 levels. In 2010, national defense led the list of research priorities, receiving 59 percent of all U.S. R&D spending. Health research captured another 21.5 percent of spending. NSF provides tables for each research area that separate spending by federal agency and program.

  • Read more about Defense, Health Lead in Federal R&D Funding

U.S. House and Senate Subcommittees Consider FY13 Funding for Commerce, NASA, NSF

Wednesday, April 18, 2012

This week, both the U.S. House and the Senate Appropriations Subcommittees on Commerce, Justice, Science and related agencies (CJS) approved FY13 funding legislation supporting several key TBED agencies.

  • Read more about U.S. House and Senate Subcommittees Consider FY13 Funding for Commerce, NASA, NSF

Tags

Select up to 5
  • (-) federal budget (8)
  • (-) NSF (8)
  • EDA (4)
  • dept of commerce (3)
  • federal agency (2)
  • NASA (2)
  • SBA (2)
  • USDA (2)
  • congress (1)
  • dept of defense (1)
  • dept of energy (1)
  • fy15budget (1)
  • fy18 budget (1)
  • fy18budget (1)
  • fy24budget (1)
  • NIH (1)
  • NIST (1)
  • R&D (1)

Recent news from the SSTI Digest

Recent Research: What makes place-based economic development policies work?

Wednesday, September 9, 2026
Place-based economic development is back near the center of federal policy, from Opportunity Zones to the CHIPS and Science Act. That renewed attention comes with a familiar problem: decades of enterprise zones, tax incentives, infrastructure investments, and other geographically targeted programs have produced results that are hard to summarize cleanly. In a new NBER working paper, Matthew Freedman and David Neumark ask the better question: not simply whether or not these policies work, but under what conditions they might work, for whom, and why. Their review points to a practical conclusion: policy design matters and targeting a distressed community with development-focused financial incentives is rarely enough on its own.
economic development

A BBBRC grant builds momentum for a highly trained semiconductor workforce

Wednesday, September 9, 2026
For the civic leaders of Osceola County, the Great Recession of 2008 made clear that they could not base their economy so heavily on travel and tourism. By the time COVID-19 hit in 2020, they knew the steps they had taken to diversify their economy were the right ones. When the Build Back Better Regional Challenge (BBBRC) opportunity arose in 2021, the county and its partners were well-positioned to operationalize the benefits the grant presented to the region and create a trained workforce for a recently attracted semiconductor industry. How did Osceola County get here? There are potential approaches to emulate by more areas of the county dependent on low-wage sectors like tourism or, for that matter, extraction-focused regions subject to “boom and bust.” 
semiconductors
workforce

The impact of tax incentives on early-stage company investment varies

Wednesday, September 9, 2026
One persistent question in economic development policy is how incentives impact private sector investment decisions. Recent and ongoing research from Murillo Campello and Guilherme Junqueira of the University of Florida, published in the National Bureau of Economic Research working paper series, explores the impact of the Qualified Small Business Stock (QSBS) program on venture capital risk-taking. The researchers found that the availability of QSBS tax benefits strongly influences venture capital investment behavior, specifically in traditionally structured venture capital funds. They also found no similar behavior among angel or corporate investors, an insight that may hold important program design and policy lessons for the TBED community. 
tax incentives
investing
State Science & Technology Institute (SSTI) logo

Footer

  • About
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Membership
    • TBED Community of Practice
  • Join
    • Member Benefits
    • Member List
  • Join SSTI
  • Sign up for SSTI Digest

© 2025 SSTI, All Rights Reserved.

1391 W 5th Avenue Ste 323, Columbus OH 43212

614.901.1690