Skip to main content
Skip to main content
State Science & Technology Institute (SSTI) logo

Secondary Menu

  • Events
    • Educational Opportunities
    • Annual Conference
    • Webinars
    • Past Events
  • Advocacy
    • Innovation Advocacy Council
    • Policy Statements
  • Job Corner
  • Sign In
  • Search

Main menu

  • About SSTI
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Team
    • Contact Us
    • TBED Community of Practice
  • Membership
    • Why Join
    • Join/Renew
    • Member List
  • Resources
    • Digest Articles
    • Useful Stats
    • Recent Research
    • Webinar Library
  • Funding
    • Funding Supplement
    • Federal Funding Video library
  • Join SSTI
  • Sign up for SSTI Digest

Search

Displaying 1 - 2 of 2
Authored on

Useful Stats: NIH SBIR/STTR application success rates & trends, FY 2012-2021

Friday, July 22, 2022

In fiscal year 2021, the nationwide success rate of applicants for National Institutes of Health (NIH) Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) Phase I awards decreased slightly from FY 2020. This continued a downward trend over recent years. The success rate for NIH SBIR/STTR Phase I was nearly 13 percent (647 of 5,132 approved) in FY 2021, a decrease from nearly 14 percent (636 of 4,684 approved) in FY 2020 and from nearly 16 percent for all proposals submitted over the past decade.

  • Read more about Useful Stats: NIH SBIR/STTR application success rates & trends, FY 2012-2021

Useful Stats: Agency SBIR/STTR awards by state, 2009-2019

Thursday, September 10, 2020

Consideration of a state’s trends in the distribution of SBIR awards by federal agency may help program leaders and policy makers optimize the design and performance for state and regional support of innovation-based startups. For instance, knowing which federal agencies provide the dominant share of awards in a state can inform a program’s marketing and outreach efforts, and, more importantly for the startups being assisted, it can guide recruiting the right mix of mentors and knowledge assets to a program’s technical assistance capabilities.

Consideration of a state’s trends in the distribution of SBIR awards by federal agency may help program leaders and policy makers optimize the design and performance for state and regional support of innovation-based startups. For instance, knowing which federal agencies provide the dominant share of awards in a state can inform a program’s marketing and outreach efforts, and, more importantly for the startups being assisted, it can guide recruiting the right mix of mentors and knowledge assets to a program’s technical assistance capabilities. The data also can inform efforts to attract investors and potential customers with similar alignment of interests with companies in a state’s SBIR portfolio. SSTI’s focus this week on the agency distribution of SBIR awards by state over the past decade reveals some interesting insights. Next week we will take a deeper dive into the data and examine awardee distribution trends at the regional level.

An exclusive SSTI analysis reveals that for the 10-year period from 2009 to 2018, two federal agencies were the top contributors to SBIR/STTR spending in every state and the District of Columbia. The Department of Defense (DoD) accounted for the greatest SBIR/STTR spending in 29 states while the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) was the greatest funder in 22 states. This trend remains the same when including 2019 award data, although it is important to note that as of the writing of this article, DoD’s complete 2019 SBIR/STTR data was not available.

  • Read more about Useful Stats: Agency SBIR/STTR awards by state, 2009-2019

Tags

Select up to 5
  • (-) STTR (2)
  • (-) useful stats (2)
  • SBIR (2)
  • NIH (1)

Recent news from the SSTI Digest

Recent Research: What makes place-based economic development policies work?

Wednesday, September 9, 2026
Place-based economic development is back near the center of federal policy, from Opportunity Zones to the CHIPS and Science Act. That renewed attention comes with a familiar problem: decades of enterprise zones, tax incentives, infrastructure investments, and other geographically targeted programs have produced results that are hard to summarize cleanly. In a new NBER working paper, Matthew Freedman and David Neumark ask the better question: not simply whether or not these policies work, but under what conditions they might work, for whom, and why. Their review points to a practical conclusion: policy design matters and targeting a distressed community with development-focused financial incentives is rarely enough on its own.
economic development

A BBBRC grant builds momentum for a highly trained semiconductor workforce

Wednesday, September 9, 2026
For the civic leaders of Osceola County, the Great Recession of 2008 made clear that they could not base their economy so heavily on travel and tourism. By the time COVID-19 hit in 2020, they knew the steps they had taken to diversify their economy were the right ones. When the Build Back Better Regional Challenge (BBBRC) opportunity arose in 2021, the county and its partners were well-positioned to operationalize the benefits the grant presented to the region and create a trained workforce for a recently attracted semiconductor industry. How did Osceola County get here? There are potential approaches to emulate by more areas of the county dependent on low-wage sectors like tourism or, for that matter, extraction-focused regions subject to “boom and bust.” 
semiconductors
workforce

The impact of tax incentives on early-stage company investment varies

Wednesday, September 9, 2026
One persistent question in economic development policy is how incentives impact private sector investment decisions. Recent and ongoing research from Murillo Campello and Guilherme Junqueira of the University of Florida, published in the National Bureau of Economic Research working paper series, explores the impact of the Qualified Small Business Stock (QSBS) program on venture capital risk-taking. The researchers found that the availability of QSBS tax benefits strongly influences venture capital investment behavior, specifically in traditionally structured venture capital funds. They also found no similar behavior among angel or corporate investors, an insight that may hold important program design and policy lessons for the TBED community. 
tax incentives
investing
State Science & Technology Institute (SSTI) logo

Footer

  • About
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Membership
    • TBED Community of Practice
  • Join
    • Member Benefits
    • Member List
  • Join SSTI
  • Sign up for SSTI Digest

© 2025 SSTI, All Rights Reserved.

1391 W 5th Avenue Ste 323, Columbus OH 43212

614.901.1690