Skip to main content
Skip to main content
State Science & Technology Institute (SSTI) logo

Secondary Menu

  • Events
    • Educational Opportunities
    • Annual Conference
    • Webinars
    • Past Events
  • Advocacy
    • Innovation Advocacy Council
    • Policy Statements
  • Job Corner
  • Sign In
  • Search

Main menu

  • About SSTI
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Team
    • Contact Us
    • TBED Community of Practice
  • Membership
    • Why Join
    • Join/Renew
    • Member List
  • Resources
    • Digest Articles
    • Useful Stats
    • Recent Research
    • Webinar Library
  • Funding
    • Funding Supplement
    • Federal Funding Video library
  • Join SSTI
  • Sign up for SSTI Digest

Search

Displaying 1 - 1 of 1
Authored on

States of Innovation 2017: Clean & renewable energy policy

Thursday, October 5, 2017

This week we begin a series on state legislation pertaining to the innovation economy that has been enacted this year around the country. This first installment of the States of Innovation 2017 series deals with clean and renewable energy.

States have passed more than 230 bills related to clean and renewable energy to date in 2017, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL). Broadly, the legislation can be divided between policies directly supporting energy innovation — through R&D expenditures or targeted economic development initiatives — and policies implementing structural changes —through the regulatory environment, incentives for production facilities, renewable portfolio standards and other requirements. This breadth of activity clearly demonstrates that clean and renewable energy is of high interest throughout the country, but will be challenging to innovators and entrepreneurs planning development over time or across states.

  • Read more about States of Innovation 2017: Clean & renewable energy policy

Tags

Select up to 5
  • (-) energy (1)
  • (-) state budgets (1)

Recent news from the SSTI Digest

Recent Research: What makes place-based economic development policies work?

Wednesday, September 9, 2026
Place-based economic development is back near the center of federal policy, from Opportunity Zones to the CHIPS and Science Act. That renewed attention comes with a familiar problem: decades of enterprise zones, tax incentives, infrastructure investments, and other geographically targeted programs have produced results that are hard to summarize cleanly. In a new NBER working paper, Matthew Freedman and David Neumark ask the better question: not simply whether or not these policies work, but under what conditions they might work, for whom, and why. Their review points to a practical conclusion: policy design matters and targeting a distressed community with development-focused financial incentives is rarely enough on its own.
economic development

A BBBRC grant builds momentum for a highly trained semiconductor workforce

Wednesday, September 9, 2026
For the civic leaders of Osceola County, the Great Recession of 2008 made clear that they could not base their economy so heavily on travel and tourism. By the time COVID-19 hit in 2020, they knew the steps they had taken to diversify their economy were the right ones. When the Build Back Better Regional Challenge (BBBRC) opportunity arose in 2021, the county and its partners were well-positioned to operationalize the benefits the grant presented to the region and create a trained workforce for a recently attracted semiconductor industry. How did Osceola County get here? There are potential approaches to emulate by more areas of the county dependent on low-wage sectors like tourism or, for that matter, extraction-focused regions subject to “boom and bust.” 
semiconductors
workforce

The impact of tax incentives on early-stage company investment varies

Wednesday, September 9, 2026
One persistent question in economic development policy is how incentives impact private sector investment decisions. Recent and ongoing research from Murillo Campello and Guilherme Junqueira of the University of Florida, published in the National Bureau of Economic Research working paper series, explores the impact of the Qualified Small Business Stock (QSBS) program on venture capital risk-taking. The researchers found that the availability of QSBS tax benefits strongly influences venture capital investment behavior, specifically in traditionally structured venture capital funds. They also found no similar behavior among angel or corporate investors, an insight that may hold important program design and policy lessons for the TBED community. 
tax incentives
investing
State Science & Technology Institute (SSTI) logo

Footer

  • About
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Membership
    • TBED Community of Practice
  • Join
    • Member Benefits
    • Member List
  • Join SSTI
  • Sign up for SSTI Digest

© 2025 SSTI, All Rights Reserved.

1391 W 5th Avenue Ste 323, Columbus OH 43212

614.901.1690