Skip to main content
Skip to main content
State Science & Technology Institute (SSTI) logo

Secondary Menu

  • Events
    • Educational Opportunities
    • Annual Conference
    • Webinars
    • Past Events
  • Advocacy
    • Innovation Advocacy Council
    • Policy Statements
  • Job Corner
  • Sign In
  • Search

Main menu

  • About SSTI
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Team
    • Contact Us
    • TBED Community of Practice
  • Membership
    • Why Join
    • Join/Renew
    • Member List
  • Resources
    • Digest Articles
    • Useful Stats
    • Recent Research
    • Webinar Library
  • Funding
    • Funding Supplement
    • Federal Funding Video library
  • Join SSTI
  • Sign up for SSTI Digest

R&D

U.S. Corporate R&D Volume I: Top 500 Firms in R&D by Industry Category

Friday, January 1, 1999

The report introduces the U.S. Corporate research and development (R&D) data series to provide new information and context on the R&D activity of the Nation’s top 500 R&D spending corporations. Data is based on the Standard and Poor’s Compustat database.

  • Read more about U.S. Corporate R&D Volume I: Top 500 Firms in R&D by Industry Category

Globalizing Industrial Research and Development 2nd Edition

Friday, January 1, 1999

The report expands and updates the information contained in an earlier study based upon 1992 data. It examines a wide range of practical questions and policy concerns arising from the rapid growth of the
global R&D enterprise.

  • Read more about Globalizing Industrial Research and Development 2nd Edition

Science and Engineering Indicators: 1998

Thursday, January 1, 1998

The report by the National Science Board provides informaion on S&T resources needed by policymakers, industry and academia in weighing policy options. New features include several reflections on futre pressures and possible trends coupled with the identification of a number of important data and information gaps.

  • Read more about Science and Engineering Indicators: 1998

Collaborative R&D: How Effective Is It?

Thursday, January 1, 1998

According to the author, research and development collaboration is a means, not an end. Moreover, the dearth of systematic analysis and evaluation of existing federal policies toward collaboration hampers efforts to match the design of collaborative programs to the needs of different firms, industries, or sectors.

  • Read more about Collaborative R&D: How Effective Is It?

Why Firms Form Research Joint Ventures: Theory and Evidence

Wednesday, January 1, 1997

The authors analyze a model of research joint ventures (RJV) with asymmetric firms and differentiated products. They then test the various explanations for RJV formation using data now available through the U.S. National Cooperative Research Act.

  • Read more about Why Firms Form Research Joint Ventures: Theory and Evidence

Endogenous Growth With Technological Change: A Model Based on R&D Expenditure

Wednesday, January 1, 1997

The aim of the paper is to theoretically and empirically analyze the role that aggregate R&D-expenditures play in the growth of per capita income. Another goal of the paper is to analyze how R&D-expenditure affects productivity growth using cross-country data.

  • Read more about Endogenous Growth With Technological Change: A Model Based on R&D Expenditure

Globalizing Industrial Research and Development

Sunday, January 1, 1995

The report explores the major factors influencing the
location decisions of foreign research and development (R&D) facilities in the United States. Findings indicate that investment motivations for U.S. R&D abroad and for foreign R&D in the United States are strikingly similar.

  • Read more about Globalizing Industrial Research and Development

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • …
  • Page 65
  • Page 66
  • Page 67
  • Page 68
  • Page 69
  • Page 70
  • Page 71
  • Page 72
  • Page 73
Subscribe to R&D

Recent news from the SSTI Digest

Recent Research: What makes place-based economic development policies work?

Wednesday, September 9, 2026
Place-based economic development is back near the center of federal policy, from Opportunity Zones to the CHIPS and Science Act. That renewed attention comes with a familiar problem: decades of enterprise zones, tax incentives, infrastructure investments, and other geographically targeted programs have produced results that are hard to summarize cleanly. In a new NBER working paper, Matthew Freedman and David Neumark ask the better question: not simply whether or not these policies work, but under what conditions they might work, for whom, and why. Their review points to a practical conclusion: policy design matters and targeting a distressed community with development-focused financial incentives is rarely enough on its own.
economic development

A BBBRC grant builds momentum for a highly trained semiconductor workforce

Wednesday, September 9, 2026
For the civic leaders of Osceola County, the Great Recession of 2008 made clear that they could not base their economy so heavily on travel and tourism. By the time COVID-19 hit in 2020, they knew the steps they had taken to diversify their economy were the right ones. When the Build Back Better Regional Challenge (BBBRC) opportunity arose in 2021, the county and its partners were well-positioned to operationalize the benefits the grant presented to the region and create a trained workforce for a recently attracted semiconductor industry. How did Osceola County get here? There are potential approaches to emulate by more areas of the county dependent on low-wage sectors like tourism or, for that matter, extraction-focused regions subject to “boom and bust.” 
semiconductors
workforce

The impact of tax incentives on early-stage company investment varies

Wednesday, September 9, 2026
One persistent question in economic development policy is how incentives impact private sector investment decisions. Recent and ongoing research from Murillo Campello and Guilherme Junqueira of the University of Florida, published in the National Bureau of Economic Research working paper series, explores the impact of the Qualified Small Business Stock (QSBS) program on venture capital risk-taking. The researchers found that the availability of QSBS tax benefits strongly influences venture capital investment behavior, specifically in traditionally structured venture capital funds. They also found no similar behavior among angel or corporate investors, an insight that may hold important program design and policy lessons for the TBED community. 
tax incentives
investing
State Science & Technology Institute (SSTI) logo

Footer

  • About
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Membership
    • TBED Community of Practice
  • Join
    • Member Benefits
    • Member List
  • Join SSTI
  • Sign up for SSTI Digest

© 2025 SSTI, All Rights Reserved.

1391 W 5th Avenue Ste 323, Columbus OH 43212

614.901.1690

  • LinkedIn
  • RSS