• As the most comprehensive resource available for those involved in technology-based economic development, SSTI offers the services that are needed to help build tech-based economies.  Learn more about membership...

SSTI Digest

Congressional Research Service releases report on federal programs supporting regional innovation systems

This week the Congressional Research Service (CRS) released Regional Innovation: Federal Programs and Issues for Consideration, which provides a summary of federal programs supporting regional innovation systems (RIS), including programs of the CHIPS and Science Act. As described in the report, federal support of RIS is a place-based approach to economic development, with a goal of encouraging development of innovation ecosystems across the country, especially in regions that have benefitted less than others from the rise of the technology-based economy. The report also addresses the scale, scope and duration of the federal investments, asking Congress to consider whether funding periods for the programs are adequate to achieve RIS goals and “how best to sustain regional innovation efforts after federal funding ceases.” Programs discussed are administered by the National Science Foundation (NSF), the Department of Commerce (DOC), the Department of Energy (DOE), and the Small Business Administration (SBA), including: Regional Innovation Engines Program (NSF) The CHIPS and Science Act authorized the creation of the Regional Innovation Engines to support a broad…

NIST maintains status quo of Bayh-Dole Act’s march-in rights provisions, for now

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) published the revised Bayh-Dole Act rule, “Rights to Federally Funded Inventions and Licensing of Government Owned Inventions,” clarifying procedures and removing outdated references. Revisions were made in response to over 80,000 comments received in response to a notice of proposed rulemaking issued in January 2021. An earlier proposed change that would have codified the long-held policy that march-in rights (rights granted to the federal government in specified circumstances allowing it to grant patent licenses to parties other than the patent owner if the research and development is federally funded) cannot be exercised solely on the basis of product pricing is not included in the revisions. The Department of Commerce and the Department of Health and Human Services will convene a working group of diverse stakeholders — federal agencies, patient groups, tech transfer organizations, industry, and investors — to consider further clarifications to the rule, in particular, whether perceived high product pricing may be grounds to exercise march-in rights. Bayh-Dole allows the government to assert march-in…

EDA awards $27.9M for eight Communities of Practice to bolster economic development, including two SSTI are involved in

This week the Economic Development Administration (EDA) announced it had completed awarding $27.9 million in cooperative agreements to establish eight economic development Communities of Practice, including the Technology-Based Economic Development (TBED) Community of Practice led by SSTI to help build the capacity and disseminate effective technology-based economic development practices across the innovation industry and the Building Better Regions Community of Practice where SSTI has partnered with RTI. Each EDA award will build a Community of Practice designed to connect participants to capture and disseminate practical knowledge and bring together thematically related groups of economic development practitioners who are working to develop economic ecosystems conducive to the creation of quality jobs for American workers. Activities across the eight communities are planned to include tailored technical assistance, strategic networking, and topical programming opportunities to help identify, amplify and scale best practices in economic development. The EDA-funded communities include SSTI’s Technology-Based Economic Development (TBED) Community of Practice ($3.…

Multiple states advance child labor law changes that remove protections for children

As states and local economies tackle an ongoing workforce shortage and a tight labor market, some state legislatures are looking to relax or reform their child labor laws. These proposed changes come as U.S. child labor has been a subject of controversy and debate in recent months amid the reports of federal investigations involving under-aged workers in automobile factories and in meat/food processing plants, or investigative exposés involving cereal factories, twelve-year-old roofers, and underage slaughterhouse workers. While child labor, both federal/state-sanctioned and otherwise, is occurring in every state, a handful of states are either seeking to reduce the restrictions on youth employment or relax their states’ child labor protections, ostensibly to help employers and businesses meet their hiring needs. Labor experts report that the issue of child or youth labor is a persistent trend, but it is particularly acute when employers or businesses struggle to find talent, as well as during difficult economic times. (The U.S. Labor Department has reported a 70% increase in minors being employed illegally by companies since 2018, many of whom are migrant…

Concerns raised about 2017 tax law’s impact on industry R&D

While the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 was passed more than five years ago, many businesses seem to be just discovering the effects of one of its sections this tax season. The law stipulated that, for tax years beginning in 2022, companies could no longer choose to expense their entire “research and experimentation” costs in one year and must instead amortize those cost over five years (with a half year look-back). The result is posing a threat for companies with limited, or non-fungible, cash flow. Congress displayed broad support for restoring the original rule but failed to pass the change during the previous session. The question on many people’s minds is, “what happens now?” Background Prior to Dec. 31, 2021, Section 174 of the Internal Revenue Code allowed companies to choose between expensing 100% of research and experimentation costs in the current year or amortizing those costs over five years (or longer, in the case of foreign expenditures). The 2017 tax law ended this practice, requiring all companies to amortize their costs. The Journal of Accountancy provides an example of how this change will affect a company with $100,000 in annual…

Some US investments in other countries under scrutiny

The U.S. Department of Treasury and the International Trade Administration within the U.S. Department of Commerce have issued reports considering a program to address national security concerns “arising from outbound investments from the United States into sensitive technologies that could enhance the technological capabilities of countries of concern in ways that threaten U.S. national security.” The reports were required by Congress as part of the most recent appropriations bill and come amid growing concern about China’s technological capacity and if American venture capital funds are helping fuel it. Reports from the two departments to Congress focus on outbound investments from the U.S. into sensitive technologies that could enhance technological capabilities of “countries of concern” in ways that could threaten the U.S. Those investments that would be under consideration are not currently captured by export controls, sanctions, or other related authorities. The two-page Commerce report noted that the approach currently under consideration would focus on a sub-set of certain key advanced technologies and action might include “prohibiting certain investments…

OSTP report sets the stage for nationwide biotech innovation

A new report compiled by The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) outlines a whole-of-government approach to biotechnology and making it a national priority. The report lays out bold goals over two decades for biotech R&D, calling for an increase in agricultural productivity by 28% in the next decade and reducing food waste and loss by 50% by 2030. The Administration is aiming for more efficient agriculture, the creation of more nutritious food, an increase in sustainability of the entire food system, and its resilience to climate change and other external problems. The report sets a series of “bold goals” centered on biotechnology and biomanufacturing R&D to further those aims and “highlight what could be possible with the power of biology. These goals are intended to provide a broad vision for the U.S. bioeconomy and what can be achieved with concerted action from industry, academia, nonprofits, the Federal Government, and other organizations.” An Executive Order signed by the president in September stresses that use of biotechnology and biomanufacturing be ethical and responsible. The change will be centered on a…

SSTI members support innovation programs on the Hill

The SSTI Innovation Advocacy Council continues to work toward additional appropriations for Regional Technology and Innovation Hubs, Build to Scale, and the Federal and State Technology (FAST) Partnership. This week, the Council facilitated meetings with SSTI members and congressional offices to discuss funding priorities. SSTI also released a letter signed by 70 national and regional entities that support fully-funding the Tech Hubs program. During the meetings, offices across the Hill expressed support for the SSTI Innovation Advocacy Council’s priority programs. However, staff do not yet have sufficient clarity about the FY 2024 budget levels or process to know how this support may translate into actual funding. Matt Riehl with JumpStart and Markus Videnieks with Lorain County Community College were among the SSTI members participating in Hill Day this week in Washington, D.C. Tom Womack with AgLaunch and Lindsey Cox with Launch TN met with the Tennessee delegation during the SSTI Innovation Advocacy Council Hill Day. Interested organizations can support SSTI's efforts to bolster these programs by adding their name to the…

Is the future of work a four-day workweek?

The idea of changing the 40 hour workweek standard has been floated for decades, and more frequently discussed in recent years as companies confront pandemic-related stress, burnout and the “Great Resignation.” But, even as some smaller U.S. companies (mostly in tech) have moved toward offering a shorter workweek, the idea has not become mainstream, despite some states’ best efforts. A shorter work week for the nation has been floated since 1956, when during a reelection campaign stop, then-Vice President Richard M. Nixon predicted that a four-day workweek was in the “not too distant future,” as part of the GOP administration’s economic policies. Earlier this month, California Congressman Mark Takano reintroduced the Thirty-Two Hour Workweek Act. Similar to legislation he co-sponsored with Reps. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) and Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) in 2021, it would amend the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) to change the national standard workweek to 32 hours. (The current 40-hour week dates back to a 1940 amendment to the Fair Labor Standards Act. The amendment, which revised the standard from 44 hours, is the last time the workweek has been legislatively adjusted in the…

SSTI outlines ideas for planning, design of EDA Tech Hubs

Expanding U.S. innovation capacity sits at the heart of SSTI’s mission, and it was that driving force that guided our response to the Economic Development Administration’s request for information to inform the planning and design of the regional Technology and Innovation Hub (Tech Hubs) program last week. With $10 billion authorized for the program, and $500 million appropriated, the opportunity for growth in the nation demands a thoughtful and actionable plan. SSTI argues that where the country is now has been decades in the making; therefore, a deliberate, well-considered plan providing ample opportunity for regions to both comment on proposed program guidelines and develop local partnerships is needed. In short, EDA should resist the temptation to get the money out the door as fast as possible. The SSTI response takes into consideration our broad perspective of previous federal and state initiatives intended to strengthen regional economies, as well as feedback from prior awardees and applicants for EDA programs. The Tech Hubs program will provide a new opportunity to meet current social, health, climate and economic challenges, and it is imperative that…

Commentary: When hope is all you have left in dealing with climate change

The press release for the latest report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) opens in what has become a tradition for environmental reporting: a dire statistic intended to inspire a desire for action. This time, it’s that average global greenhouse gas emissions for the 2010-2019 decade were the highest levels in human history. The strategy has worked on the world’s young people and the small handful of people out of 100 who vote for and contribute to environmental change each year (less than 4% of American charitable giving went to environmental/animal welfare organizations in 2021). Unfortunately, these crowds are both powerless and too small. The second sentence of the latest IPCC press release is also predictable: “Without immediate and deep emissions reductions across all sectors, limiting global warming to 1.5°C is beyond reach.”  [Emphasis added.] What the IPCC doesn’t do next, after sounding the alarm based on three year old data, is point out that global carbon dioxide emissions actually increased to even higher record levels in 2022, according to the New York Times story. The finger for the emissions increase, according to the…

ARPA-H releases details on site selection and first BAA

The Advanced Research Projects for Health (ARPA-H) released plans to establish hub sites in three locations across the United States and announced their strategy for site selection. With one site to be located in the National Capital Region (NCR), ARPA-H will issue a draft Request for Consortium Agreement (RCA) to solicit recommendations for the second and third hub sites.  The ARPA-H hub sites are planned to support a network of partners, or spokes, that will form the foundation of a nationwide health network to “accelerate better health outcomes for everyone.” Although the region for the first hub site has already been determined, ARPA-H will issue a draft Request for Consortium Agreement (RCA) to solicit recommendations for the second and third hub sites. Submitted recommendations should describe why the geographic location is a best fit considering the goals and capabilities of ARPA-H.   The first hub, to be located in the National Capital Region (NCR), will take a “human-centered approach” and emphasizes stakeholder engagement and legislative collaboration to ensure new health capabilities reach target…