SSTI Digest

As noted in our separate overview, the 25-page American Jobs Plan provides goals, highlights and proposals, but also raises questions about how proposals would be implemented and even exactly how much money would be spent. Those details presumably will come in the near future when legislative language is submitted. The document and much of the news covering it is organized around six goals. For our readership, we have taken a slightly different approach. Major themes and key aspects of the proposal are below. All quoted text is from the AJP summary released by the White House on the morning of March 31, 2021.

Much of the public policy and governmental spending focus to date regarding COVID recovery has been just that: recovery. The infrastructure proposal, the America Jobs Plan (AJP), President Biden unveiled this week represents his proposal to start moving forward.  In remarks about the proposal, he described it as “not a plan that tinkers around the edges,” a “once-in-a-generation investment” that will lead to “transformational progress.”

The breadth of the plan and its heavy focus on science, technology, innovation and manufacturing should excite SSTI Weekly Digest readers. Issues that we’ve covered for more than two decades (e.g., digital divide, increasing our R&D investment, regional disparities) are addressed in a scale we have never seen a president propose before.

There are a lot of details still to be sorted out. The initial public document outlining the AJP is similar to the executive summary of the annual federal budget: plenty of big numbers wrapped around carefully selected words but short on details or even many breakdowns below the top line figures.    

While President Biden’s infrastructure proposal with heavy investments in science, technology and innovation garnered most of the press attention in the last week, a number of other developments occurred in or impacting federal policy, including:

For those looking for examples of the impact state investment, university involvement and tech-based economic development can have in rural parts of the country, one can examine news from Appalachian Ohio that Stirling Ultracold reached a definitive merger agreement on March 22 to be acquired for a reported $258 million by publicly-traded BioLife Solutions. The original lead investor in Stirling Ultracold is TechGROWTH Ohio, one of Ohio Third Frontier’s regional entrepreneurial service providers. BioLife intends to keep the Stirling Ultracold brand intact and maintain existing staff in Athens, Ohio. The 160 employees in the rural Southeast Ohio county is the equivalent on a per capita basis to more than 11,000 employees in Cook County, Illinois (the county Chicago is located in).    

The stability of the economic innovation wavelength hinges on the distribution of forward generated project capital while being able to simultaneously build a lasting commitment towards upwards stratigeric commercialization prospects within the target sector. This has been reaffirmed by researchers at the Institute for Innovative Solution Developments who, through the use of a tri-helix macramedian progression model, found that the defining variables of entrepreneurial achievability boil down to providable funding cohesion and a consistent commitment towards developing staff and researcher technologicity. Using a reverse projectization equation, dummy variables were generated to balance for the inherent sectorilized differences found within the annualized project databases alongside the availability for prerelease fund generation, all while taking into account recently revised rules surrounding private capital distribulation.

As the most ambitious innovation initiative that Europe has ever undertaken, the European Union (EU) recently launched the European Innovation Council (EIC) with a €10 billion (about $11.7 billion USD) fund that will provide both non-dilutive grants to and direct equity investments in innovative startups within the union. After a successful three-year pilot, the EIC is merging with the current Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises, and has already launched its first official program with a call for proposals worth €1.5 billion (approximately $1.8 billion USD).

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) estimates that nearly one-fourth of the rural population —14.5 million people — lack access to broadband services. In tribal areas, nearly one-third of the population lacks access. Even in areas where broadband is available, approximately 100 million Americans still do not subscribe to services. The problem, often referred to as the digital divide or broadband gap, has seen renewed policy interest from governors and legislators since the world has turned more to virtual learning and business during the pandemic. One way policymakers have attempted to connect rural America is through public grants or dedicated funds. Just in 2021, proposals at the state level to expand broadband have included:

Facing current challenges and a changing economy, Oregon is turning to innovation-based economic growth. Their new 10-year Innovation Plan focuses on ensuring a competitive position through four means — traded sector industries that constantly innovate; a robust entrepreneurial ecosystem; financial capital markets that are open to investing in innovative firms and entrepreneurs; and promoting itself as a place to start and grow in innovative company.

The state’s first plan was created in 2006, and the new plan, commissioned by Business Oregon and facilitated by TEConomy Partners, notes that while progress has been made, “access to opportunities in innovation-oriented fields has been unequal,” and calls for a focus on engaging all citizens. “We believe that economic justice is a fundamental precursor to achieving an equitable outcome for all segments of our population,” it says. And in order to drive change in the state’s economy, efforts to address broadband accessibility and affordability, a thriving talent base and robust R&D enterprise are needed, it notes.

Over the course of 2020, Americans reported a total of $4.2 billion in losses due to internet fraud and cybercrime, an increase from the $3.5 billion reported in 2019. In addition, the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Internet Crime Complaint Center experienced a record number of reports surrounding cybercrime and internet fraud: 791,790 total complaints were filed throughout 2020, a 69 percent increase from 2019. The FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center’s recently released Internet Crime Report 2020 also finds that the COVID-19 pandemic has presented new targets for internet criminals as both individuals and businesses reported online financial crimes surrounding the CARES Act stimulus funds, including the Paycheck Protection Program and unemployment insurance fraud.

The R&D performed at colleges and universities is an important driver for the innovation economy — generating new knowledge, spurring invention, training STEM talent, and supporting economic development. This edition of SSTI’s Useful Stats analyzes metropolitan-level data for 2019 from the National Science Foundation on higher education R&D (HERD) expenditures and personnel. Nearly 981,000 individuals in higher education across the U.S. were classified as R&D personnel in 2019. As shown by the green shading in the interactive map below, the metropolitan areas with the greatest total number of HERD personnel in 2019 were Baltimore, Maryland* (44,323); New York-Newark-Jersey City (43,103); Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, California (35,796); Boston-Cambridge-Newton (35,587); and Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington (27,147).

Last week not only marked the anniversary of the COVID-19 pandemic, but also the release of updated employment data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). The monthly data shows that the pandemic had a very unusual effect on workers, experienced both as a uniquely-chaotic period of labor force participation, but also as an unprecedented immediate drop in employment. The graphic captures just how chaotic the last year has been. Compared against the trends of the past two decades, it is clear that the COVID-19 recession has, thus far, affected workers very differently than either the brief 2001 recession or the Great Recession.

Several more State of the State addresses were delivered already this month, leaving just a few states yet to go and the pandemic and recovery from the pandemic, not surprisingly, continue to feature heavily in governors’ plans. Energy opportunities, tax cuts, broadband and shifts in the model for higher education are in play in this week’s review of addresses from California, Florida, New Hampshire and Wyoming.